Just too many characters,[not enough iso][MERGED THREAD]
Comments
-
tizian2015 wrote:
But there is no real choosing. There are a few chars really good and many not so good. So if I make the wrong decision it completely ruins the rest of the game for me. And the possibility to choose from not so good chars and be not able to level the good ones for quite a while means, the not-so-good chars are just traps. Is this good game design?
YES....I completed CHULK (since three months ago) released on last november and missing several covers of Cyclops, Iceman that were released long before him....OH, I completely forgot Kingpin and Prof X that lacks on covers, so defenitely YES0 -
Eddiemon wrote:Same thread has been posted for ~2 years now, and the release schedule has been consistent. And yet people still play. I assume the complaining about the same thing is a religious thing at this point.
Maybe the schedule is the same, but the needed iso for the same schedule grows exponential. So in iso its far away from beeing the same.0 -
tizian2015 wrote:halirin wrote:Sincere advice: play less and don't worry about leveling everyone "on pace". When you were a child the games were simpler and you had more free time, so it was possible to get and do everything in far more games. Now you are grown and the number of things do and obtain in games has grown beyond what you ever would have imagined, so you can and should adjust your expectations. It is hard, so you have my sympathy. But it's something that will make you much happier if you succeed. It's sort of like learning to reduce sugar intake despite millennia of natural selection pushing humans to crave it. Good luck!
But there is no real choosing. There are a few chars really good and many not so good. So if I make the wrong decision it completely ruins the rest of the game for me. And the possibility to choose from not so good chars and be not able to level the good ones for quite a while means, the not-so-good chars are just traps. Is this good game design?0 -
Quebbster wrote:tizian2015 wrote:halirin wrote:Sincere advice: play less and don't worry about leveling everyone "on pace". When you were a child the games were simpler and you had more free time, so it was possible to get and do everything in far more games. Now you are grown and the number of things do and obtain in games has grown beyond what you ever would have imagined, so you can and should adjust your expectations. It is hard, so you have my sympathy. But it's something that will make you much happier if you succeed. It's sort of like learning to reduce sugar intake despite millennia of natural selection pushing humans to crave it. Good luck!
But there is no real choosing. There are a few chars really good and many not so good. So if I make the wrong decision it completely ruins the rest of the game for me. And the possibility to choose from not so good chars and be not able to level the good ones for quite a while means, the not-so-good chars are just traps. Is this good game design?
If I´m supposed to choose, because ressources are limited, they have to be on a similar level. If they are not, my decission, if wrong, must not mean, i ruined my game for months (or more). And adding this point: the decissions for max level 3*s were negated by the 3*nerf with the introduction of champsystem. So a right choice was negated by the game and all the ressources are bound.0 -
tizian2015 wrote:Quebbster wrote:tizian2015 wrote:halirin wrote:Sincere advice: play less and don't worry about leveling everyone "on pace". When you were a child the games were simpler and you had more free time, so it was possible to get and do everything in far more games. Now you are grown and the number of things do and obtain in games has grown beyond what you ever would have imagined, so you can and should adjust your expectations. It is hard, so you have my sympathy. But it's something that will make you much happier if you succeed. It's sort of like learning to reduce sugar intake despite millennia of natural selection pushing humans to crave it. Good luck!
But there is no real choosing. There are a few chars really good and many not so good. So if I make the wrong decision it completely ruins the rest of the game for me. And the possibility to choose from not so good chars and be not able to level the good ones for quite a while means, the not-so-good chars are just traps. Is this good game design?
If I´m supposed to choose, because ressources are limited, they have to be on a similar level. If they are not, my decission, if wrong, must not mean, i ruined my game for months (or more). And adding this point: the decissions for max level 3*s were negated by the 3*nerf with the introduction of champsystem. So a right choice was negated by the game and all the ressources are bound.
Then again, I already have all Three-stars championed and am working on getting all fourstars championed too, so maybe I am a bit nutty.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.9K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.3K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.7K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 508 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 424 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 300 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.7K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements