Fearless Defenders Discussion Thread
Comments
-
Just popping in to answer a question I've seen here and fill in some gaps:
- Everyone in the alliance gets the rewards at the end of the event.
- In addition to the 50 HP "moved" from single-player progression rewards to alliance rewards (it's likely that more folks will get that reward than got the progression reward previously, so it both moved and got more generous), we made the remaining higher-end single-player progression rewards easier to get.
Appreciate the feedback, keep it coming!0 -
IceIX wrote:Impulse wrote:frozenhero1 wrote:I for one think the alliances are a nice addition. It's not like you're forced to be in one to participate or you're missing out on any unbelievable alliance-only prizes
That would be true, if they didn't gut existing rewards and shift them to alliances. Alliances add nothing, they're another irritating hurdle and all you get is same reward. Yippie.
The lack of a 50hp 500 progression award and blue BP from ranks 2-5 clearly show that you shifted important awards from the current prize structure to alliance awards. If you wanted it to be a bonus on top of existing awards, keeping the original prize structure while giving out event tokens + iso for alliance placement would have been a much better way to keep the important prizes you give out (3* covers/hp) to a minimum without forcing alliances onto us in this fashion. This would make it so that people still have a big incentive to join an alliance (15% at a 3* cover will still make people want to join alliances without you guys giving away too many covers in the process) without making it feel like we're forced to join an alliance in order to keep our existing income. I think that 50hp progression award is pretty important for newer players trying to increase their roster size, so shifting it to alliance rewards is pretty detrimental to them as it forces them to join a decent alliance.0 -
I 2nd Polarity on this. I feel that the shift in the rewards puts a lot of focus on being in an alliance right now0
-
NorthernPolarity wrote:IceIX wrote:Impulse wrote:frozenhero1 wrote:I for one think the alliances are a nice addition. It's not like you're forced to be in one to participate or you're missing out on any unbelievable alliance-only prizes
That would be true, if they didn't gut existing rewards and shift them to alliances. Alliances add nothing, they're another irritating hurdle and all you get is same reward. Yippie.
The lack of a 50hp 500 progression award and blue BP from ranks 2-5 clearly show that you shifted important awards from the current prize structure to alliance awards. If you wanted it to be a bonus on top of existing awards, keeping the original prize structure while giving out events tokens + iso for alliance placement would have been a much better way to keep the important prizes you give out (3* covers/hp) to a minimum without forcing alliances onto us in this fashion.
I totally agree. Keep event reward structure as was.
Top 1 gets 2x event token + 1000 ISO + 500hp
2-5 gets 1x token 1000 ISO 100hp
6-15 gets 1x token 500 ISO 100hp
16-30 gets 500 ISO 100hp
Etc
Etc
Etc0 -
I see the Psylocke cover is 1100 and I don't think that's any lower than what it was before, not that it matters because I haven't seen anyone with even 1000 in any of my PvP brackets in a long time. 900 rating for 50 HP might be barely reachable compared to 1000 before but that only affects a very small portion of players. Alliances up to 2500 gets 50 HP, so let's say 5 guys per alliance that's 12500 people, and I guess it's fair to say that we didn't have 12500 people hitting a rating of 500 before (there are some brackets I'm in where 500 would almost be enough for top 10).0
-
Phantron wrote:I see the Psylocke cover is 1100 and I don't think that's any lower than what it was before, not that it matters because I haven't seen anyone with even 1000 in any of my PvP brackets in a long time. 900 rating for 50 HP might be barely reachable compared to 1000 before but that only affects a very small portion of players. Alliances up to 2500 gets 50 HP, so let's say 5 guys per alliance that's 12500 people, and I guess it's fair to say that we didn't have 12500 people hitting a rating of 500 before (there are some brackets I'm in where 500 would almost be enough for top 10).
The 3* covers were at 1200 previously.0 -
All the top end rewards have been reduced by 100.
Essentially they've just removed the 500 HP reward and moved everyone down one progression step.0 -
Demiurge_Will wrote:Just popping in to answer a question I've seen here and fill in some gaps:
- Everyone in the alliance gets the rewards at the end of the event.
- In addition to the 50 HP "moved" from single-player progression rewards to alliance rewards (it's likely that more folks will get that reward than got the progression reward previously, so it both moved and got more generous), we made the remaining higher-end single-player progression rewards easier to get.
Appreciate the feedback, keep it coming!
we made the remaining higher-end single-player progression rewards easier to get
PLEEEEEEEAAAAASE, don't treat me like an idiot. I like to think I'm not. For being a "for fun addition", you're shoving alliances pretty hard up my rectum.0 -
How about keeping placement at 2 covers, but lowering the 1100 progression cover more attainable? I've yet to see anyone break even 1000.
Whichever way it's done, I would really prefer to have that 3rd cover back. And getting the 2-star covers wouldn't hurt either (or put them in the alliance reward).0 -
Nemek wrote:Phantron wrote:I see the Psylocke cover is 1100 and I don't think that's any lower than what it was before, not that it matters because I haven't seen anyone with even 1000 in any of my PvP brackets in a long time. 900 rating for 50 HP might be barely reachable compared to 1000 before but that only affects a very small portion of players. Alliances up to 2500 gets 50 HP, so let's say 5 guys per alliance that's 12500 people, and I guess it's fair to say that we didn't have 12500 people hitting a rating of 500 before (there are some brackets I'm in where 500 would almost be enough for top 10).
The 3* covers were at 1200 previously.
Yeah, I figure it's lower, but I don't think it matters because I have yet to see anyone with a rating of 1000 in any of my PvP brackets in a long time.0 -
Psykopathic wrote:I totally agree. Keep event reward structure as was.
Top 1 gets 2x event token + 1000 ISO + 500hp
2-5 gets 1x token 1000 ISO 100hp
6-15 gets 1x token 500 ISO 100hp
16-30 gets 500 ISO 100hp
Etc
Etc
Etc
Its not that easy since that would inject a lot of extra hp into the system. My original thought was something like
Top 1 - 2 tokens + 250hp + iso
Top 2-50 - 2 Tokens + 50hp + iso
Top 50-100 - 1 Token + iso
top 50-250 - various amounts of iso.
I think this reward structure would make it feel like the awards were gutted less, but you run into the problem of there not really being any incentive for the lower ranked alliances to try and advance in rank since ranks 100-2500 are functionally identical. I guess this doesn't really matter since the current system behaves in the same way.0 -
Phantron wrote:Nemek wrote:Phantron wrote:I see the Psylocke cover is 1100 and I don't think that's any lower than what it was before, not that it matters because I haven't seen anyone with even 1000 in any of my PvP brackets in a long time. 900 rating for 50 HP might be barely reachable compared to 1000 before but that only affects a very small portion of players. Alliances up to 2500 gets 50 HP, so let's say 5 guys per alliance that's 12500 people, and I guess it's fair to say that we didn't have 12500 people hitting a rating of 500 before (there are some brackets I'm in where 500 would almost be enough for top 10).
The 3* covers were at 1200 previously.
Yeah, I figure it's lower, but I don't think it matters because I have yet to see anyone with a rating of 1000 in any of my PvP brackets in a long time.
I've been able to hit 1100 in pvp with effort and luck
1200 was just not possible.0 -
Phantron wrote:Nemek wrote:Phantron wrote:I see the Psylocke cover is 1100 and I don't think that's any lower than what it was before, not that it matters because I haven't seen anyone with even 1000 in any of my PvP brackets in a long time. 900 rating for 50 HP might be barely reachable compared to 1000 before but that only affects a very small portion of players. Alliances up to 2500 gets 50 HP, so let's say 5 guys per alliance that's 12500 people, and I guess it's fair to say that we didn't have 12500 people hitting a rating of 500 before (there are some brackets I'm in where 500 would almost be enough for top 10).
The 3* covers were at 1200 previously.
Yeah, I figure it's lower, but I don't think it matters because I have yet to see anyone with a rating of 1000 in any of my PvP brackets in a long time.
I figure most people have same mind set as me. 900 rewards 1000 ISO. Sweet. That's where people usually go so I'm usually safe once I get there. At 1000 there's 50hp? Hmmmm. Do I wanna break my shield at 950 to risk pushing for a 50hp reward and use a 75hp shield after? NO! If the 3* cover was at 1000 then a 100hp reward at 1100 and a 4* at 1200 I would be much more likely to try and push for that 4* than now. ATM it would be cheaper to just pay full price.0 -
It does look like there's more ISO to won in the prizes though which is nice.
I guess this might endorse their policy for reducing 2* star covers where people have too many covers and not enough ISO to level them so this is how they apply it to 3*.0 -
Demiurge_Will wrote:Just popping in to answer a question I've seen here and fill in some gaps:
- Everyone in the alliance gets the rewards at the end of the event.
- In addition to the 50 HP "moved" from single-player progression rewards to alliance rewards (it's likely that more folks will get that reward than got the progression reward previously, so it both moved and got more generous), we made the remaining higher-end single-player progression rewards easier to get.
Appreciate the feedback, keep it coming!
Granted this is only the first alliance tourney - I'm sure things will, as always, continue to get tweaked.0 -
Puritas wrote:Phantron wrote:Nemek wrote:Phantron wrote:I see the Psylocke cover is 1100 and I don't think that's any lower than what it was before, not that it matters because I haven't seen anyone with even 1000 in any of my PvP brackets in a long time. 900 rating for 50 HP might be barely reachable compared to 1000 before but that only affects a very small portion of players. Alliances up to 2500 gets 50 HP, so let's say 5 guys per alliance that's 12500 people, and I guess it's fair to say that we didn't have 12500 people hitting a rating of 500 before (there are some brackets I'm in where 500 would almost be enough for top 10).
The 3* covers were at 1200 previously.
Yeah, I figure it's lower, but I don't think it matters because I have yet to see anyone with a rating of 1000 in any of my PvP brackets in a long time.
I've been able to hit 1100 in pvp with effort and luck
1200 was just not possible.
(Sorry Catalyst if you didn't want me to post the picture.)0 -
I am glad to have Catalyst in our alliance. Not the first time he passed 1200 in the recent PvP, I just can't believe it.0 -
Bye bye post.0
-
What alliance were you with?0
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.8K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.2K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.6K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 503 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 421 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 298 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.6K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements