Mizake wrote: I don't think it makes a big deal that you can't do certain nodes because you are missing certain heroes, because it does not prevent you from doing well overall in the event. However, I will say that what I found annoying was that I couldn't follow the story-line because I was locked out of content. I think that if certain nodes are made character-restricted, it would be nice if it didn't disturb the overall flow of the event, i.e. it was treated more as an optional node for dedicated players, rather than a main node that those of us who actually like the story content would not have to miss out on.
Fluffy wrote: What justification is there for it though? I've been playing F2P since day one and I think it's completely ****. Parts of This tourney are locked for people who did Youl in the last one, what kind of reward structure is that?
Jachdo wrote: I really think we are being trolled by the OP. This is just silly. The whole concept of having to meet specific criteria to access advanced content is fundamental to role playing video games. You might as well call for the removal of the hero leveling mechanic.
Fluffyudders wrote: What justification is there for it though? I've been playing F2P since day one and I think it's completely ****. Parts of this tourney are locked for people who did well in the last one, what kind of reward structure is that?