The Bob The wrote: They do seem to be fiddling a bit with progression (I remember people were really spooked by the last EotS), but the minimums do still seem to do it. It's just that the last act tends to be REALLY weighted.
The Bob The wrote: It's just that the last act tends to be REALLY weighted.
StevO-J wrote: The Bob The wrote: It's just that the last act tends to be REALLY weighted. I don't know if I understand you correctly, if not I apologise in advance, but points are more or less divided equally in each event. I think in all events the final sub gives twice the points that are given for the nodes in the first sub. The subs in between give out linearly increasing points. Say sub 1 is at '1' (or 100%) then for a 4 day event like Venom Bomb the second sub will give 1.33 points, sub 3 gives 1.67 and sub 4 gives 2. (3-day: 1, 1.5 and 2; 7-day: 1, 1.17, 1.33, 1.5, 1.67, 1.83, 2). For events with survival nodes these numbers might not be correct, I almost never seem to get out of the rubberbanding in those subs later on and calculating is too much effort for me. As for Venom Bomb, I feel like the progression is set higher than other events recently. I started sooner than I normally do but am not going to get to the LT by a long shot. I have been playing slightly less efficient in the second and third sub because of Xmas and family stuff but not enough to completely miss the final progression when comparing to other events. Not that I care much about the LT btw, it would have been nice but not worth the effort needed in this event during this holiday imo.
SirLanik wrote: So with me full doing full perfect clears (and some grinding) the entire event, I ended at 10th place. With only 48169 points. Only places 1-4 of my bracket earned enough points to get the legendary token. (with top place scoring almost 100,000 ... o_O) I'm all for making a legendary token hard to earn, but if only the top 4 people are getting it, it's placed too high.
dr tinykittylove wrote: SirLanik wrote: So with me full doing full perfect clears (and some grinding) the entire event, I ended at 10th place. With only 48169 points. Only places 1-4 of my bracket earned enough points to get the legendary token. (with top place scoring almost 100,000 ... o_O) I'm all for making a legendary token hard to earn, but if only the top 4 people are getting it, it's placed too high. When did you join the event? I started halfway through the first sub, fell asleep and missed the last refresh and entire end grind, then grinded the next 2 subs somewhat (I refuse to grind to 1 in general) and picked up the token on my first clear of the final sub.
SirLanik wrote: dr tinykittylove wrote: SirLanik wrote: So with me full doing full perfect clears (and some grinding) the entire event, I ended at 10th place. With only 48169 points. Only places 1-4 of my bracket earned enough points to get the legendary token. (with top place scoring almost 100,000 ... o_O) I'm all for making a legendary token hard to earn, but if only the top 4 people are getting it, it's placed too high. When did you join the event? I started halfway through the first sub, fell asleep and missed the last refresh and entire end grind, then grinded the next 2 subs somewhat (I refuse to grind to 1 in general) and picked up the token on my first clear of the final sub. I joined the event the minute it started. Basically it seems my brackets points were low because so few people tried. That's annoying, knowing I couldn't get the token because too few people played in my bracket.
OJSP wrote: Tatercat wrote: That sucks, but it is one of the risks of joining later brackets. The benefit of doing that though is by playing in a bracket where no one cared, you got 10th place and thus got 3 new 4* covers (of a brand new character). Where as I played the first bracket, got to the LT progression, but only placed 36th for 1 Venom cover. You walked away from that event with a greater collection of good covers than most LT "winners". One situation is not necessarily better than the other, its just that you can aim for one goal (placement rewards vs progression rewards) with the bracket you choose, but you can't guarantee both. (unless you're a whale or an obsessive grinder with a DEEEEP roster) While your post is very true.. but the quotes you were responding to actually had different situations. The one joining from the beginning, came 10th but didn't get the legendary token. (And somehow thought that too few people in the bracket affected their ability to get it??). It sounded like that was a non-vet bracket. The other joined a bit late, managed to get the token, and didn't comment about placement.
Tatercat wrote: That sucks, but it is one of the risks of joining later brackets. The benefit of doing that though is by playing in a bracket where no one cared, you got 10th place and thus got 3 new 4* covers (of a brand new character). Where as I played the first bracket, got to the LT progression, but only placed 36th for 1 Venom cover. You walked away from that event with a greater collection of good covers than most LT "winners". One situation is not necessarily better than the other, its just that you can aim for one goal (placement rewards vs progression rewards) with the bracket you choose, but you can't guarantee both. (unless you're a whale or an obsessive grinder with a DEEEEP roster)