Ebolamonkey84 wrote: If you are not familiar with me and you are curious about my experience in the game, here is some of my roster info: On day 404 2 max cover 4* over level 200 11 maxed 3* 22 other max covered 3* level 80-138
ArkPrime wrote: This is way better than ranking them all against each other for sure
mischiefmaker wrote: My name is mischiefmaker and I approve this message. Happy to see the character ranking tradition lives on!
Marc Spector wrote: ArkPrime wrote: This is way better than ranking them all against each other for sure Definitely! As the grid breakdown showed last time, a lot of characters had rankings heavily skewed towards their original (unchanged) positions in the list. This way's a lot better, and I'm looking forward to the results. (Voted this aft!)
adamLmpq wrote: I shared this with a few friends who have somewhat more limited rosters and they brought up a good point: There are many characters they don't have much experience using and aren't really qualified to rank. Would there be any way to set it up so a person could NOT rank a character and have it not weigh against that character's total score?