The great days of Po(op)laris
Options
Comments
-
ThaRoadWarrior said:Who were you fighting against? Was it in the hydra stomper PVp?
Like I said, it might have been a bug. If you guys tried it and were able to fire it, then it must be a bug. With that said, I've run into that bug several times now. I'm not complaining, though. Almost every match I play with Polaris ends before I get to that point. It only affects me when I'm attempting to use a Polaris stun-lock which is only occasional.0 -
Anon said:I say nerf every 4* until they're as bad as Talos.
Then nerf Talos.0 -
That should be what we want, but knowing the forum, there will be calls to nerf all of those characters. Let's just cut out the middle man and make everyone terrible.1
-
I've been thinking about the whole thing, and players always say they hate nerfs but love counter-play. The problem with counters is that if you're countering an overpowered character, an effective counter will also be overpowered.
Like SW completely shuts down Hulk to the point where he's no longer usable, which I assume was her goal. She's effective at that, but the effect is too wide. She also shuts down every single other character in the game.
They've been trying to give 4* players a Polaris counter for months and none of them have been effective at all because they're too weak. I understand why Polaris hasn't gotten her SW yet -- that character would immediately take over the game. But why not move to a different strategy entirely?
What if a new character had a passive that said, "if Polaris is on the enemy team at the start of the match, kill her instantly." They could create one of these for all of the "problem" characters.
This solves all the problems at once. The counter is 100% effective, but so narrow that you're not creating a different problem by introducing another overpowered character into the game.0 -
I wonder if Ronan’s Uncompromising Power is why Danver5 got nerfed…as I think about it, that combo would be outrageous if each repeater factors in all the others when destroyed…I’ll have to test it with Loki when puzzle gauntlet comes around next week.1
-
I find that theory interesting so I went to try it out against Polaris using Ronan and Wiccan. What happened was Ronan's UP triggered once each time a column was destroyed by Wiccan's Chain Lightning. So, 5* Carol should work similarly if she destroys those rows individually, instead of concurrently.0
-
I went into Simulator and ran him with Human Torch, and using Torch’s red after a decent number of repeaters were on the board and fortified did some pretty impressive damage.0
-
If you have 50 out, the number is huge. Assuming you destroyed 50 fortified repeater tiles using Torch, did you also gain 50 aps?
0 -
Thankfully Polaris week is over. See y’all next time she boosted.1
-
entrailbucket said:I've been thinking about the whole thing, and players always say they hate nerfs but love counter-play. The problem with counters is that if you're countering an overpowered character, an effective counter will also be overpowered.
Like SW completely shuts down Hulk to the point where he's no longer usable, which I assume was her goal. She's effective at that, but the effect is too wide. She also shuts down every single other character in the game.
They've been trying to give 4* players a Polaris counter for months and none of them have been effective at all because they're too weak. I understand why Polaris hasn't gotten her SW yet -- that character would immediately take over the game. But why not move to a different strategy entirely?
What if a new character had a passive that said, "if Polaris is on the enemy team at the start of the match, kill her instantly." They could create one of these for all of the "problem" characters.
This solves all the problems at once. The counter is 100% effective, but so narrow that you're not creating a different problem by introducing another overpowered character into the game.0 -
For years I've wanted a character that has a passive that turns off all (other) passives, but the problem now is every decent character generates all their value with one or more passives. The passive nullifier guy just completely breaks the game.
I could maybe see him being a boss fight, but players would complain so much about that, I don't think they'd ever do it.
Players hate PvE fights that are remotely difficult or that require any thought -- if you can't trivially faceroll the fight with Okoye or Polaris or whatever while you watch tv, it's literally offensive to the loudest group of players.2 -
Whenever that power is suggested, I would continue to propose that 5* Thanos's purple be a battle-start passive, either as a countdown,repeater, or unique infinity gauntlet tile like boss-thanos has that once cleared don't come back.1
-
ThaRoadWarrior said:Whenever that power is suggested, I would continue to propose that 5* Thanos's purple be a battle-start passive, either as a countdown,repeater, or unique infinity gauntlet tile like boss-thanos has that once cleared don't come back.0
-
I guess; he has definitely survived into the modern game WAY better than most of his peers, but his active powers are crazy expensive, he exists to Court Death pretty exclusively.0
-
His active powers were always bad, even back when he was released. Nobody ever cast them.
Court Death is just so good that they balanced it by not giving him anything else of use.
That was back when they cared about character balance. Today they'd give him Court Death + a power booster ability that also reduces damage + an 8-turn stun that cost 6.0 -
entrailbucket said:I've been thinking about the whole thing, and players always say they hate nerfs but love counter-play. The problem with counters is that if you're countering an overpowered character, an effective counter will also be overpowered.
Like SW completely shuts down Hulk to the point where he's no longer usable, which I assume was her goal. She's effective at that, but the effect is too wide. She also shuts down every single other character in the game.
They've been trying to give 4* players a Polaris counter for months and none of them have been effective at all because they're too weak. I understand why Polaris hasn't gotten her SW yet -- that character would immediately take over the game. But why not move to a different strategy entirely?
What if a new character had a passive that said, "if Polaris is on the enemy team at the start of the match, kill her instantly." They could create one of these for all of the "problem" characters.
This solves all the problems at once. The counter is 100% effective, but so narrow that you're not creating a different problem by introducing another overpowered character into the game.
BSSM hard counters Grocket and isn’t OP.
Electro hard counters iHulk and isn’t OP.
Morbius hard counters Polaris and isn’t OP.
It is absolutely possible for a character to counter an OP character and not be broken themselves.
The real problem is that If the character is weak on defense or slow on offense, you put yourself at risk playing the counter. So even your Polaris “insta-kill” character wouldn’t get played if the rest of the kit was slow or weak on defense. Because Morbius is as close to that as possible.The issue isn’t Polaris. It’s that the game is built on speed and defense (the latter in PVP only). You don’t have one or both, you likely don’t get played. You have one or both (and Polaris is blazing fast), you do get played.This is why 5* character boosts were the best thing to happen to the tier in a long time. Having a different “fastest” that is shaken up week by week is the best way to have an ever shifting meta and to incentivize those who skip mediocre 5* because they can rest on the 1-2 meta characters released each year.0 -
Daredevil217 said:entrailbucket said:I've been thinking about the whole thing, and players always say they hate nerfs but love counter-play. The problem with counters is that if you're countering an overpowered character, an effective counter will also be overpowered.
Like SW completely shuts down Hulk to the point where he's no longer usable, which I assume was her goal. She's effective at that, but the effect is too wide. She also shuts down every single other character in the game.
They've been trying to give 4* players a Polaris counter for months and none of them have been effective at all because they're too weak. I understand why Polaris hasn't gotten her SW yet -- that character would immediately take over the game. But why not move to a different strategy entirely?
What if a new character had a passive that said, "if Polaris is on the enemy team at the start of the match, kill her instantly." They could create one of these for all of the "problem" characters.
This solves all the problems at once. The counter is 100% effective, but so narrow that you're not creating a different problem by introducing another overpowered character into the game.
BSSM hard counters Grocket and isn’t OP.
Electro hard counters iHulk and isn’t OP.
Morbius hard counters Polaris and isn’t OP.
It is absolutely possible for a character to counter an OP character and not be broken themselves.
The real problem is that If the character is weak on defense or slow on offense, you put yourself at risk playing the counter. So even your Polaris “insta-kill” character wouldn’t get played if the rest of the kit was slow or weak on defense. Because Morbius is as close to that as possible.The issue isn’t Polaris. It’s that the game is built on speed and defense (the latter in PVP only). You don’t have one or both, you likely don’t get played. You have one or both (and Polaris is blazing fast), you do get played.This is why 5* character boosts were the best thing to happen to the tier in a long time. Having a different “fastest” that is shaken up week by week is the best way to have an ever shifting meta and to incentivize those who skip mediocre 5* because they can rest on the 1-2 meta characters released each year.
*Every* character can beat an enemy Polaris when I'm fighting her. I don't need any special help to do it. A counter is a character that an offensive player's Polaris cannot beat on defense.
These are rare in MPQ but becoming more frequent. An offensive Thor often cannot beat an enemy Hulk. Thus Thor disappears from the meta. An offensive Hulk literally cannot beat an enemy SW. Hulk goes from 100% used to 0% overnight. These counter characters have the effect of a nerf without actually doing a nerf, which is what players want...counterplay, not nerfs!
I hear about rock/paper/scissors all the time but they've never managed to do this. Right now, on offense you can just throw rock every time and win every time. They're close though...they could accomplish it by, say, changing Thor so that he always beats SW, on offense and defense. (Please don't buff Thor, this is theoretical).
It'd set up like:
Hulk always beats Thor (and Thor cannot ever beat Hulk)
SW always beats Hulk (and Hulk cannot ever beat SW)
Thor always beats SW (and SW cannot ever beat Thor)
Lesser counters like Electro, BSS, Morbius, etc, have a place but they don't affect the meta in the same way. If you can't beat Polaris, or Rocket, or whoever, when you're on offense, then those guys will be important or useful. But they're never going to force a character completely out of the meta because they're ineffective counters on defense.
I agree that the boosts have massively improved things, but the meta characters (unfortunately) are still dominant, because the meta characters are generally +100 levels or more better than everyone else. Putting 100 levels on a mid-tier character like Deadpool makes him competitive with Okoye, which is good, but ultimately pretty ridiculous.0 -
entrailbucket said:
I hear about rock/paper/scissors all the time but they've never managed to do this. Right now, on offense you can just throw rock every time and win every time. They're close though...they could accomplish it by, say, changing Thor so that he always beats SW, on offense and defense. (Please don't buff Thor, this is theoretical).
It'd set up like:
Hulk always beats Thor (and Thor cannot ever beat Hulk)
SW always beats Hulk (and Hulk cannot ever beat SW)
Thor always beats SW (and SW cannot ever beat Thor)If you did this (such that 'Hulk always beats Thor' on offense AND defense) then what you've accomplished is giving players an auto-win on offense. All they have to do is see what character the other team uses and they use the other character and 'poof' instant win, no skill required and no threat of a loss.I doubt the Dev's would ever want that and players would become quickly bored too.KGB1 -
KGB said:entrailbucket said:
I hear about rock/paper/scissors all the time but they've never managed to do this. Right now, on offense you can just throw rock every time and win every time. They're close though...they could accomplish it by, say, changing Thor so that he always beats SW, on offense and defense. (Please don't buff Thor, this is theoretical).
It'd set up like:
Hulk always beats Thor (and Thor cannot ever beat Hulk)
SW always beats Hulk (and Hulk cannot ever beat SW)
Thor always beats SW (and SW cannot ever beat Thor)If you did this (such that 'Hulk always beats Thor' on offense AND defense) then what you've accomplished is giving players an auto-win on offense. All they have to do is see what character the other team uses and they use the other character and 'poof' instant win, no skill required and no threat of a loss.I doubt the Dev's would ever want that and players would become quickly bored too.KGB
It's like that now.
Once you've reached a certain roster level, you don't lose on offense, unless something goes terribly wrong. High level players wipe like 1-2% of the time, at most. Wins are already basically instant and guaranteed in this game, as long as you bring a team with a certain power level. There's no skill required, and no real threat of a loss.
0 -
dianetics said:I can’t believe this conversation is still going on.
certain toons have hard counters that reduce downtime.
polaris is countered by morbius. Ihulk is countered by 5witch.
nobody is saying you can’t beat those teams. But there are certain characters that make downing them more efficiant.
you could always take your 500+ roster and slap down a 5* champ baby. That’s not the point.It’s giving options and tools to let people move up and feel like that have worked for something.
This isn't about Polaris, I couldn't care less about her specifically, it's about overpowered characters and counterplay in general. The same sentiment applied to Bishop, when he existed, to Okoye, Gambit, Apocalypse etc.
You should not be able to win any fight in the game by using one character or one team 100% of the time.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 45.3K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.6K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.5K MPQ General Discussion
- 6.3K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2.1K MPQ Character Discussion
- 173 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.4K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 13.9K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 528 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.5K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 441 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 306 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.8K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 400 Other Games
- 159 General Discussion
- 241 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements