OJSP said: HoundofShadow said: I think not commenting on things that the players in this forum dislike a lot is a better option. Based on past histories (in the last 2+ years) of them answering questions in the forum, the players here have, most of the time, proven that they can't accept their explanations of why certain things happened a certain way. I can pull a lot of past q&a answered by the dev and things rarely ends on good terms. I can count a number of those players who are still playing or not banned from the forum yet, with the fingers of my hands.
HoundofShadow said: I think not commenting on things that the players in this forum dislike a lot is a better option. Based on past histories (in the last 2+ years) of them answering questions in the forum, the players here have, most of the time, proven that they can't accept their explanations of why certain things happened a certain way. I can pull a lot of past q&a answered by the dev and things rarely ends on good terms.
axmoss said: DAZ0273 said: So they changed like, 3 progression rewards, that's it? Maybe they have changed up the actual round rewards or something because otherwise is doesn't really seem a huge change. Guess we will wait and see. If this is it though seems a bit bizarre Boss Events have been gone so long. They didn't change the Alliance Round rewards either. Rounds 2-5 still 3* cover, 4-7 4* covers, and 8 is still one Legendary token (apoc's store).
DAZ0273 said: So they changed like, 3 progression rewards, that's it? Maybe they have changed up the actual round rewards or something because otherwise is doesn't really seem a huge change. Guess we will wait and see. If this is it though seems a bit bizarre Boss Events have been gone so long.
DAZ0273 said: axmoss said: DAZ0273 said: So they changed like, 3 progression rewards, that's it? Maybe they have changed up the actual round rewards or something because otherwise is doesn't really seem a huge change. Guess we will wait and see. If this is it though seems a bit bizarre Boss Events have been gone so long. They didn't change the Alliance Round rewards either. Rounds 2-5 still 3* cover, 4-7 4* covers, and 8 is still one Legendary token (apoc's store). Oh. Well that makes all of this even stranger. I wasn't really expecting 5* shards but I at least thought we might get some 4* shards. I can see that players are going to be confused and disappointed maybe but I am still glad Bosses are back.
Why should the majority of the forum users suffer because of a minority?
OJSP said: HoundofShadow said: I don't know what that means and how it is relevant to what I posted. You're always grouping all players as the same. That's what I meant. Why should the majority of the forum users suffer because of a minority? If all businesses treat their customers like that, there won't be any business left in the world.
HoundofShadow said: I don't know what that means and how it is relevant to what I posted.
OJSP said: bluewolf said:1. Make these characters required but NOT tied to a specific node (see Snowball Fight) - this seems both simplest and obviously is possible to accomplish.2. At least make Phoenix a possible choice for the Jean Grey node? 1. I think the characters were tied to the nodes too in Snowball Fight (I could be wrong, but that's what I recall). But, they weren't too much of an issue because they were 3*s and 4*s (Iceman, Cyclops and Star-Lord)2. We can use Phoenix for the Jean Grey node (left node)
bluewolf said: OJSP said: bluewolf said:1. Make these characters required but NOT tied to a specific node (see Snowball Fight) - this seems both simplest and obviously is possible to accomplish.2. At least make Phoenix a possible choice for the Jean Grey node? 1. I think the characters were tied to the nodes too in Snowball Fight (I could be wrong, but that's what I recall). But, they weren't too much of an issue because they were 3*s and 4*s (Iceman, Cyclops and Star-Lord)2. We can use Phoenix for the Jean Grey node (left node) I am pretty certain about the Snowball Fight being open to any character anywhere, but maybe there's a different PVP like this that I'm thinking of.I stand corrected on Phoenix......oops.
HoundofShadow said: Many a times, decisions are made due to the actions of minority that end up causing inconveniences to the majority. I'm sure you can find many examples in real life. Imagine that you are having a normal conversation with a group of people in a meeting, and then one of them decided to speak in an aggressive manner at you. Then, more people join in the verbal assault while you are trying to address those group that have genuine concerns. If the aggressors can't leave the place, then the speaker has to stop the meeting. Now, picture this happening in almost every meetings. In here, the fact that some are getting many likes, instead of getting their posts flagged for their unnecessary aggressions/insults at the dev tells a lot. Anyway, we are 3 hours away from X-Men vs Apocalypse. Whether there are any 5* shards anywhere in the event will be revealed by the 36th hour.
bluewolf said: House of X remains one of the bigger missteps in terms of design for PVP, I'm sorry to say.But FORCING the player to use specific characters in specific nodes while targets (and retals) come in on potentially any node means that you as the player (this is worst for those of us in 5 land) have, really, one choice in terms of which node to use to select targets on (Prof) or else decide to put out a team with a 3 or a 4 on it for anyone else with 5Prof to hit with extreme prejudice.