Kinesia said: It's a bad customer experience and it's completely avoidable. They fixed it on other things, there is ZERO reason they should be continuing the stubborness by letting the financial and emotional abuse continue in this one area.
Caeman said: @Match Makerand I’ve been civil up to this point, but since there has been little to no correction in this obvious flaw in the game, chances of compensation for wasted resources are equally akin to castles in the sky, customer support is as likely as the arrival of Godot and the only rapid response seems to come from the censorship, I think it’s fair to say a few of us feel that maybe it’s been earned.I’ll be more than happy to apologize for my little transgression when the great big one done to us is rectified. Forgive me if I don’t hold my breath.
Horadrim said: @Oktagon_Support Requesting the following changes:1) Rare card: non-dupe cost: 400 jewels2) Mythic: non-dupe cost: 600 jewels3) Masterpiece: non-dupe cost: 800 jewels4) Vanguards: non-dupe cost: plus 200 jewels to base costIncrease total jewel rewards (combined weekday individual events and weekend individual/coalition events). This will significantly increase engagement from all players (both play-to-win and free-to-play). I did spend more than 22K jewels total for the War Vanguards and I am still missing original Gideon and Tezzeret. Not buying any vanguard anymore, unless guaranteed non-dupe.
Tremayne said: @QuiksilverHg- but isn’t that what @Horadrim is proposing?As I read both your post, Horadrim proposed non-dupe packs, with an increase in both price and rewards in pinks.You QuiksilverHg wants packs to be non-dupe, without any changes to price and rewards.So I is left with the feeling that the two proposals are equal, but perhaps I’m missing something?