Roland113 said: So i'm thinking of compiling a new set of ratings this fall and want a bit of input. My thought is to rank the characters in up to ten categories. Ultimately, I'd love to come up to capture how good Grocket and Gamora are together yet only decent on their own.So, what categories would you consider? Here's my short list so far:Match DamageNukeAoEDefenseAp genSpecial tilesChaos (board shake)NicheWhat are your thoughts?
Straycat said: Not sure how this would look like. Would you give every character a score in each category that they are eligible. For exampleGamora Nuke 6/10, Stun 9/10, Tile creating 7/10, Teamwork 8/10 etc...Or would you go thru each category and rank the characters?Nuke 1.Carol 2. Riri 3. Iron Fist etc...I remember there being a ranking where the characters were given tier scores based on offense, defense, and ease of use. I like that each category applies to each character, but that is too broad. The 2nd example doesn't really reflect how the overall character is. But I'll say some categories missing are passives, tile buffing, self synergy, and maybe negative effects
Hilk said: I think this is great, and would love a link to the sheer when done - I often try to remember “who can I use to tan/etcs?”... while collecting the info, You may want things like the colors used, etc.That said, trying to pick or compute a ranking from all these factors will be basically impossible... in the end I think you will come down to a few (PvE and PvP rankings). PvE will likely be based on speed and durability for different situations/ opponent types.PvP is a little more interesting as they are starting to design the characters so they each have a weakness that someone else can use to beat them...