Roland113 said: Straycat said: Not sure how this would look like. Would you give every character a score in each category that they are eligible. For exampleGamora Nuke 6/10, Stun 9/10, Tile creating 7/10, Teamwork 8/10 etc...Or would you go thru each category and rank the characters?Nuke 1.Carol 2. Riri 3. Iron Fist etc...I remember there being a ranking where the characters were given tier scores based on offense, defense, and ease of use. I like that each category applies to each character, but that is too broad. The 2nd example doesn't really reflect how the overall character is. But I'll say some categories missing are passives, tile buffing, self synergy, and maybe negative effects My thought is that every character would get a score in each category as in your first example.
Straycat said: Not sure how this would look like. Would you give every character a score in each category that they are eligible. For exampleGamora Nuke 6/10, Stun 9/10, Tile creating 7/10, Teamwork 8/10 etc...Or would you go thru each category and rank the characters?Nuke 1.Carol 2. Riri 3. Iron Fist etc...I remember there being a ranking where the characters were given tier scores based on offense, defense, and ease of use. I like that each category applies to each character, but that is too broad. The 2nd example doesn't really reflect how the overall character is. But I'll say some categories missing are passives, tile buffing, self synergy, and maybe negative effects
Roland113 said: As a thought, do you think that AoE is an important category or could that be rolled into the nuke category? I find that with the speed game, I typically eliminate a few of the targets before I get enough AP for the AoE. Granted, Dazzler may reinvent that meta before we know it.