jamesh said: If you're going to rebalance the tier, it would be a shame to simply switch from Gambit as top of the heap to someone else. Ideally there'd be no character that is obviously best, with each character being strong against some opponents and weak against others.If most players end up gravitating towards one character, then that will make other characters appealing to take on those targets. In turn, this might encourage use of a third character to take on the next set of targets. In the end, it should encourage a diverse set of opponents to fight against rather than splitting the player base into haves and have nots.
Anon said: I have a champed GladiaThor and a 4/3/4 Gambit. Is it worth spending CP to get the last 2 covers to champ him? I know it'd make PVP a hell of a lot easier, but 500 CP is quite an investment.The biggest obstacle stopping me from it however, is the fear that I spend the CP (seeing as how RNG absolutely refuses to give me 5* covers anymore) and they need him immediately afterwards.
OJSP said: maguirenumber6 said: What about him making only one red and purple per round, and stealing one, rather than two? How do we spread those effects into 5 covers?
maguirenumber6 said: What about him making only one red and purple per round, and stealing one, rather than two?
OJSP said: BlackBoltRocks said:Simply have no changes for some additional covers, such as going from 3 to 4 covers. There are several powers like this. Really? I can’t think of any.
BlackBoltRocks said:Simply have no changes for some additional covers, such as going from 3 to 4 covers. There are several powers like this.