Puppy Puncher wrote: I don't like it. I liked the pebbles fact that every character was different so when you advanced, your constantly learning new characters. It kept the game fresh. I'm trying to collect all the characters but I've lost that urge with the introduction of 3* Thor.
Fluffyudders wrote: It would be a quick and fairly interesting way of making the pool of available characters much bigger, without compromising on roster space because there would be no reason to keep lower versions (what use is a lvl85 2* Thor when you have a lvl141 3* Thor?).
abuelo wrote: There is not a single good thing about Gold Thor, or where it could be headed.
allorin wrote: Fluffyudders wrote: It would be a quick and fairly interesting way of making the pool of available characters much bigger, without compromising on roster space because there would be no reason to keep lower versions (what use is a lvl85 2* Thor when you have a lvl141 3* Thor?). I disagree. Am I going to throw away my lvl 85 full cover Thor 2* for my current lvl 18 two cover lazythor? He'll no. So I need two roster slots for1 character. Introduce a platinum 4* version and it will get even worse - I'll have one cover for about three months, and will need another roster slot to hold it. It is teh suck.
SirKopath wrote: Boo to all recurring character covers. I want more distinct characters, not versions of ones we already have!
Fluffyudders wrote: I meant in the long run. Once your 3* Thor is more powerful than your lvl85 2* Thor, what point is there in keeping the latter?
beezer37_84 wrote: Fluffyudders wrote: I meant in the long run. Once your 3* Thor is more powerful than your lvl85 2* Thor, what point is there in keeping the latter? Events that only allow the 2*. Same type of decision as keeping certain 1*s for only that purpose.