TPF Alexis said: Nah, it's just been said enough times already.
Michaelcles said: TPF Alexis said: Nah, it's just been said enough times already. Then let's keep talking about it until it changes. The more posts about it the more likely it will be taken seriously.All things considered, it is a pretty easy thing for them to change. Just some numbers in code.
TPF Alexis said: Michaelcles said: TPF Alexis said: Nah, it's just been said enough times already. Then let's keep talking about it until it changes. The more posts about it the more likely it will be taken seriously.All things considered, it is a pretty easy thing for them to change. Just some numbers in code. It's not about how easy it would be for them. It's about whether or not their finance people think it will gain the company more money. Apparently, the projection is that it won't. Just sayin'.
bluewolf said: At 40k iso a day, which is what a high playing roster can average, that's 471 days. A younger roster has a much higher hill to climb with less iso gain. I realize there are more than 50 4's, so I'm low in my estimate.
bluewolf said: TPF Alexis said: Michaelcles said: TPF Alexis said: Nah, it's just been said enough times already. Then let's keep talking about it until it changes. The more posts about it the more likely it will be taken seriously.All things considered, it is a pretty easy thing for them to change. Just some numbers in code. It's not about how easy it would be for them. It's about whether or not their finance people think it will gain the company more money. Apparently, the projection is that it won't. Just sayin'. At 40k iso a day, which is what a high playing roster can average, that's 471 days. A younger roster has a much higher hill to climb with less iso gain. I realize there are more than 50 4's, so I'm low in my estimate.
broll said: Honestly with the improvements to ISO income I don't think they are too high anymore.