nexus13 said: I'm not fully sure how cycling will work but I'm pretty sure New Perspectives is probably broken.
Mainloop25 said: First Impressions - Rares:.Deem Worthy - Again, red burn stays underwhelming in this set too. I don't know if I'll play it, most likely not.
Tilwin90 said:- Trials - what's with the "no reinforce"? Does this mean you cannot play secondary copies as long as the support is already onto the board?
mixed bag said: Sphinx's Tutelage + Cycling = Ouch.
wereotter said: mixed bag said: Sphinx's Tutelage + Cycling = Ouch. Might not be so bad. Depends on if they count cycling as draw or as fetch. Also I suspect the AI is unlikely to cycle cards rather than play them.
shteev said: wereotter said: mixed bag said: Sphinx's Tutelage + Cycling = Ouch. Might not be so bad. Depends on if they count cycling as draw or as fetch. Also I suspect the AI is unlikely to cycle cards rather than play them. When WOTC release card lists, they tell their players how the cards work.
shteev said: When WOTC release card lists, they tell their players how the cards work.
Laeuftbeidir said: shteev said: When WOTC release card lists, they tell their players how the cards work. Well, the card game does need more explications since the game will use the cards correctly. Cycling is the most interesting thing for me.. The ai will either cycle every card always, or no card never. Will cycling trigger madness? Will the cycling about ability trigger if you have enough mana and for example Lili forces you to discard a card with cycling? Or are cycling cards immune like madness ones? @LakeStone