losdamianos wrote: what about posting screenshots of qb leaderboards where individuals are gaining over 300+ per hour without pointing fingers at any particular nickname. Is that also prohibited or allowed ?
Morphis wrote: Pointing fingers at anyone on the forum is strictly forbidden. Especially pointing fingers at developers lack of skill.
Alve wrote: Morphis wrote: Pointing fingers at anyone on the forum is strictly forbidden. Especially pointing fingers at developers lack of skill. Morphis, your comment was inflammatory and unneeded. Constructive criticism is always welcome, insulting others, be it devs, other players or people from outside of our community - is not. Please, watch your tone and avoid publishing unnecessarily provocative posts that can only lower the quality of a discussion. Thank you.
Alve wrote: to as much as 300/h,
losdamianos wrote: Alve wrote: to as much as 300/h, pic or didnt happen
Morphis wrote: losdamianos wrote: what about posting screenshots of qb leaderboards where individuals are gaining over 300+ per hour without pointing fingers at any particular nickname. Is that also prohibited or allowed ? Pointing fingers at anyone on the forum is strictly forbidden. Especially pointing fingers at developers lack of skill.
Alve wrote: losdamianos wrote: Alve wrote: to as much as 300/h, pic or didnt happen Killwind (who agreed to be my official source on that btw) routinely scores 220/h, a few others can achieve 250/h. That's players who we know are human and legit. It's reasonable to assume that someone can go faster - if we're talking about banning people solely based on scores, we can't just say that he's a cheater because he scores more than we do. So when I talked to Killwind we established that 300/h is a reasonable upper limit for a human player (as if - anything above that would be conditioned cheating, period). Other people have decided that around 150/h is the maximum and reported scores like 264/h. I'm not trying to judge who's right and whether the upper limit should be 150, 250 or 300, just saying that opinions differ and banning a player is a serious thing. So just sending scores, unless they're completely out of this world, is sometimes not enough. I will not comment on any other tools that can be used to track cheaters, whether they exist or are beingn created - mostly because my area of expertise is banning Russian spamers, giving warnings, moving threads and telling people to calm down. Not resolve technical issues
losdamianos wrote: Also just because you can win a match in less than a minute it doesnt mean you can keep it doing it consistently sooner or later you will face liliana/jace2/kiora lock down decks and you get stuck for 10-20 minutes sometimes
madwren wrote: losdamianos wrote: Also just because you can win a match in less than a minute it doesnt mean you can keep it doing it consistently sooner or later you will face liliana/jace2/kiora lock down decks and you get stuck for 10-20 minutes sometimes That's what the Quit button is for.
bken1234 wrote: madwren wrote: losdamianos wrote: Also just because you can win a match in less than a minute it doesnt mean you can keep it doing it consistently sooner or later you will face liliana/jace2/kiora lock down decks and you get stuck for 10-20 minutes sometimes That's what the Quit button is for. Speed or streaks-- you can't have both. (Hashtag 85%4Life)
losdamianos wrote: madwren wrote: losdamianos wrote: Also just because you can win a match in less than a minute it doesnt mean you can keep it doing it consistently sooner or later you will face liliana/jace2/kiora lock down decks and you get stuck for 10-20 minutes sometimes That's what the Quit button is for. quiting is for losers
DuskPaladin wrote: Because then, this could raise another question, should emulators be allowed, if they permit you to go at twice the usual higher speed. (I'm only playing on my phone, which I suppose is the case of most players.)