soenottelling wrote: 30s usually stands for 30 seconds...fyi. need an apostrophe for what you meant.
Nemek wrote: soenottelling wrote: 30s usually stands for 30 seconds...fyi. need an apostrophe for what you meant. Oh man, I definitely thought he meant 30 seconds, and thought it was maybe suspicious. But he's talking about levels...which is absolutely not suspicious at all.
jozier wrote: Another stupid thread from the worst poster on the forum.
MikeHock wrote: jozier wrote: Another stupid thread from the worst poster on the forum. Personal differences aside, I dont think it was a stupid post since I have no clue how the eff this game scores for different people. It's another **** event where people are questioning how everything works.
Kamahl-FoK wrote: MikeHock wrote: jozier wrote: Another stupid thread from the worst poster on the forum. Personal differences aside, I dont think it was a stupid post since I have no clue how the eff this game scores for different people. It's another **** event where people are questioning how everything works. Normally it wouldn't be a bad post, but the poster in question has a seriously prominent habit of declaring shenanigans on everything in sight, to the point of prolonged irritation at other player's expense. Newer players have painfully low levels on their brackets, and as such they're far from unbeatable (especially given scary 3* heroes are really really really garbage at low levels). Case closed.
mechgouki wrote: Simple terms, I was right once. It pays to check.
mechgouki wrote: It was a genuine query on the situation. If it was a declaration I would have simply reported it. I found something that seemed a little odd, I asked on the forums if it was normal, and if all reasonable doubts were cleared, I send a report. That's all I am doing. While you seem to have paid quite the attention to my posting history, you seem to have forgotten that I have called it right on one case, the person I pointed out was indeed a cheater. Simple terms, I was right once. It pays to check.
DaveyPitch wrote: mechgouki wrote: Simple terms, I was right once. It pays to check. Yeah, but a broken watch is also right twice a day.
pasa_ wrote: I doubt you can do so many points without a Hulk.
MarvelMan wrote: The ability of people with barely 1* rosters to easily take top spots over people with 2* and 3* rosters has kind of ruined my drive to play PVE, which used to be my main enjoyment of the game. Ive started tanking LR and playing PVP...which seems to be where they are driving the people who have 1+ maxed 2*s. Makes me sad.