snlf25 wrote: If I pay iso to skip somebody I should at the very least never see that team in that event again.
Phumade wrote: snlf25 wrote: If I pay iso to skip somebody I should at the very least never see that team in that event again. I only skip because the high level teams are worth so little early in the climb, By the end, I need those max level teams to be around 800 to 900 pts. This is bad idea, because it limits the economy at the end of the pvp. I almost wish there was a away to que people who are shielded. Points are so hard to find in the last 3hrs of a pvp.
bknfoodie wrote: The problem with unlimited skips is that people won't ever fight anyone higher than them. They put the skip tax in play because they felt people were skipping more than playing. Seriously, stop bargaining. The problem is the MMR. They fix that and the skip tax is fine. Would you rather have broken MMR forever with no skip tax. Or fixed MMR with skip tax?
bknfoodie wrote: The problem with unlimited skips is that people won't ever fight anyone higher than them.
simonsez wrote: bknfoodie wrote: The problem with unlimited skips is that people won't ever fight anyone higher than them. Why should you have to? As long as whatever-passes-for-matchmaking offers me someone as an acceptable matchup, why should there be constraints on picking the matchup I prefer? It's not as if there's an exploit at work here, and by skipping you can find a matchup they really didn't want you to have.
Malcrof wrote: I probably did a total of 80 skips last night, just to get a couple of fights
Square wrote: Then you get the person you skipped twice already a few minutes ago.