mischiefmaker wrote: I have good news and bad news.Good news: we're up to 144 responses!Bad news: SurveyMonkey's free version only reports a maximum of 100 responses, so all the responses after #100 are basically lost. Since I'm not terribly excited about paying $26 to upgrade (that's 4100 hp I could have instead, thank you very much), I've closed the survey a couple days early. Sorry to everyone whose input won't be counted this time around; I'll try and find something better for next time.Good news: this means I can get started on writeups!
mischiefmaker wrote: Good news: we're up to 144 responses!Bad news: SurveyMonkey's free version only reports a maximum of 100 responses, so all the responses after #100 are basically lost. Since I'm not terribly excited about paying $26 to upgrade (that's 4100 hp I could have instead, thank you very much), I've closed the survey a couple days early. Sorry to everyone whose input won't be counted this time around; I'll try and find something better for next time.
yogi_ wrote: mischiefmaker wrote: Good news: we're up to 144 responses!Bad news: SurveyMonkey's free version only reports a maximum of 100 responses, so all the responses after #100 are basically lost. Since I'm not terribly excited about paying $26 to upgrade (that's 4100 hp I could have instead, thank you very much), I've closed the survey a couple days early. Sorry to everyone whose input won't be counted this time around; I'll try and find something better for next time. Could you open another free survey with exactly the same questions and then just combine / average the two sets of results?
mischiefmaker wrote: Bad news: SurveyMonkey's free version only reports a maximum of 100 responses, so all the responses after #100 are basically lost. Since I'm not terribly excited about paying $26 to upgrade (that's 4100 hp I could have instead, thank you very much), I've closed the survey a couple days early. Sorry to everyone whose input won't be counted this time around; I'll try and find something better for next time.
mischiefmaker wrote: vudu3 wrote: Who the heck ranks a 1* at #1? Are we sure it wasn't someone mixing up OBW and MBW again? Positive. But that's all I'm saying about it until voting closes.
vudu3 wrote: Who the heck ranks a 1* at #1? Are we sure it wasn't someone mixing up OBW and MBW again?
RageFace wrote: The survey monkey is reached it's limit. Hope the people voting knew what they were talking about. And I have 42 characters not 41, am I crazy or something.
mischiefmaker wrote: But none of those compare to the hardest character to rank, who so far has votes at a whopping 33 different positions!
mischiefmaker wrote: The problem with putting characters in tiers is twofold. One, it isn't very interesting, because most of us have a pretty good idea of what the tiers look like, so such a ranking doesn't provide us with any new information. Two, if you put characters in tiers and then rank them, that's exactly as much work as just ranking them, unless I put them in tiers for you. And if I do that, then we don't get interesting results like the guy who ranked a 1* character #1.