Like the title says.
I've pulled 45 tokens, got 5 Hit Monkeys and champed him, 3 Wongs (4/3/1 +1 sharded) and 2 Kangs (1/1/1). Not bad after all.
10/45 is crazy, not "not bad"
@Bowgentle ~22%. I've seen reports of much better. Personaly anything between 15-25% is not bad. Below is "bad" and above is "crazy".
But aside from semantics, yep. Definetly good pool session.
Don't worry. You will be hit with 8% - 10% pull rate in the future if it hasn't happened yet. I'm waiting for Hit-Monkey to rotate out before I champ the trio of Wong, Kang and Magik.
I went 4/50. 2 HM to champ and an extra level and 2 Kang blue so he's 1/4/2. Not a success.
I get the feeling Wong is Away every time I visit a store with him in it....
First wave 49 opened , 3 x hit monkey, 2 x Wong 2 x Kang
Still need 2 wong to get him champed
66 pulls, 4 HM, 2 W, 1 K. Once HM is required in PVE one more time I’ll have 13 covers for him so I guess I stop until he rotates out. I would have liked more Kang covers, but at least I didn’t get too many Wongs.
52 pulls. Got 2 Hit Monkeys + 1 saved cover, now at 13 covers ready to be champed. Also pulled 1 Kang.
2/25 1 Monkey 1 Kang.
Not going any further since my Wong is already too big (never thought I would ever say that)
Pulled a bunch to finish Wongers, champed Kang in the process as he started with more covers.
Went to champ Wong and realised I was out of ISO!!! First time in a long time, but it's been coming. Dupe 4s suck that ISO down constantly. At one point I was +6MM, now a measily 3k.
50 pulls, 5 HM, 2 Wong, 1 Kang. Already had HM champed so stopped there. Not a bad pull rate but wish Kang had sent Hm away beforehand.
905 pulls Hit monkey 488 Wong 493 Kang 490
Never complain about having a big wong
@wymtime said: 905 pulls Hit monkey 488 Wong 493 Kang 490 Never complain about having a big wong
@wymtime said: 905 pulls Hit monkey 488 Wong 493 Kang 490
Do you love that trio or do you hate Magik?
Ok, I've been seeing these for years and I still don't get the purpose of them. Does somebody, like, collect all the results from these threads and use them to check the numbers, or something? If not, what are these for?
@entrailbucket said: Ok, I've been seeing these for years and I still don't get the purpose of them. Does somebody, like, collect all the results from these threads and use them to check the numbers, or something? If not, what are these for?
It's even worse when people just post pull videos without a text summary. Like, am I supposed to watch you pull for 15 minutes?
To establish the size of your Wong, obviously.
@Bowgentle said: @entrailbucket said: Ok, I've been seeing these for years and I still don't get the purpose of them. Does somebody, like, collect all the results from these threads and use them to check the numbers, or something? If not, what are these for? It's even worse when people just post pull videos without a text summary. Like, am I supposed to watch you pull for 15 minutes?
@Bowgentle said:
I don't even watch my own pulls! If I randomly have a bunch of tokens I just push the fast forward button and set the phone down. Why would anyone want to watch someone else opening tokens? It's like those "10 hours of paint drying" videos on YouTube.
I only needed two Hit Monkey covers to champ him.
It tooks 14 pulls, of which 4 were 5* covers. So a rate of 28%. I'm usually not this lucky.
Now to decide whether to skip champing Wong or not (at 4 covers)
@Bowgentle said: @wymtime said: 905 pulls Hit monkey 488 Wong 493 Kang 490 Never complain about having a big wong Do you love that trio or do you hate Magik?
I like hit monkey over Magic
Does it need a purpose?
Ppl like to post their results what's so wrong with that?
@Codex said: @entrailbucket said: Ok, I've been seeing these for years and I still don't get the purpose of them. Does somebody, like, collect all the results from these threads and use them to check the numbers, or something? If not, what are these for? Does it need a purpose? Ppl like to post their results what's so wrong with that?
@Codex said:
If "people just like to post their results" then that's the purpose...that's all I was asking.