Question - What is your opinion on feeders? More specifically, should every 3-star and 4-star be a feeder, and should every 4-star and 5-star have feeders? Thank you for your time. (MegaBee)
Answer - We have lots of opinions on feeders. Feeders are crucial to progression in the game and they play a huge role in character value. Historically a set of rules was followed that aimed to thematically connect feeders. In the case where no narrative underpinnings existed, the usual outcome was that no feeder was assigned. While we are still determining what to do about characters that don't feed / aren't fed, every character created going forward is planned to function as a feeder (even if no narrative connection exists). We're excited about what this means for rewards and collecting!
DAZ0273 said: Puck (well I mean yeah) and Colossus (why not?) both like ice hockey (probably) - link!
DyingLegend said: Also long as a 4 star feeds a 5 star.But they do dislike handing out retroactive rewards.
bladewing said: I'm hoping for retroactive feeders. Please please please. There's so many 5-stars that I have not rostered yet.
skittledaddy said: How about now and they can call it "Shardmas in July"?
Bowgentle said: skittledaddy said: How about now and they can call it "Shardmas in July"? I mean... Not like you'd USE the 5* shards 🤣
658_2 said: One of the best decisions the new regime has made is that feeders don’t need to thematically fit
TheEyeDoctorsWife said: As a devils advocate I hate feeders ! Every time a 4* is introduced I can count on 2 questions asked by the tinykitty players . A. Is it better or work with BRolaris , and B. Will it be a feeder? All it does is give players an excuse to roster a character they will never use except about 6 days a year . I’d like the new team to discontinue 5* feeders . No one is going to use those classic 5* anyway , so it’s useless except to the players who think the objective of the game is to collect them all .