Why? How would that drive new player engagement? It would just be giving Vets extra strings to their bows whilst the vast majority would get little to no benefit whatsoever.
DAZ0273 said: D3 should make rebalancing older characters one of their priorities.Why? How would that drive new player engagement? It would just be giving Vets extra strings to their bows whilst the vast majority would get little to no benefit whatsoever.Classic 5s are still too hard to cover.Exactly, so why make rebalancing them a priority? Even with a special store only the top end players can afford the luxury of pursuing classic 5*.Don't get me wrong - I like Rebalances as much as the next player but I think we have to be realistic in how often they will get done and who benefits from them.
tonypq said: DAZ0273 said: D3 should make rebalancing older characters one of their priorities.Why? How would that drive new player engagement? It would just be giving Vets extra strings to their bows whilst the vast majority would get little to no benefit whatsoever.Classic 5s are still too hard to cover.Exactly, so why make rebalancing them a priority? Even with a special store only the top end players can afford the luxury of pursuing classic 5*.Don't get me wrong - I like Rebalances as much as the next player but I think we have to be realistic in how often they will get done and who benefits from them. You're certainly entitled to your opinion as is everyone else. I don't see how rebalancing would negatively impact new player engagement. If anything it would drive it some as they'd see the fruits of their labor aren't obsolete after a month, year, or even upon release as some of these 5s are. Once they get to that tier of course. I'm not sure what your definition of rebalance is, but I never meant to imply to bring every classic 5 or lousy new 5* to be tuned up to Apoc or Shang-Chi levels. Rather just enough of a rebalance to not be total garbage. That's really not much to ask for. And hardorce vets will always have extra strings in their bow. Tweaking Wasp, Banner or other bad 5s to not not be so putrid won't upset the balance of the universe for anyone. I think most of us appreciated the tweaks they made to a few of the characters in the past couple years, most recently 5 GR. Especially as many of the 5s could be very easily be made more well off simply by reducing power costs, tuning damage, health, rather reinvent the wheel for every character.Based on your logic why make anything a priority ?Just keep releasing 4*s until every character in Marvel is present or has at least 3 versions of themselves. While at the same time releasing a very small amount of good 5s a year, surrounded by others who are obsolete before they leave the LL store. Just keep rolling out the same events year in and out, with the few occasional additions they actually do make that don't add much of a lasting impact. That's not going to drive new or veteran player engagement.
entrailbucket said: They just ran about 12 unboosted events in a row and I saw 0 Ghost Riders.His rebalance was nice, but utterly meaningless.
entrailbucket said: Also, if they rebalanced a classic character and that character became good or useful in any way, the 550 meta hoarder/optimizers would throw a tantrum about it, and we know that the devs are terrified of them.
tonypq said: entrailbucket said: Also, if they rebalanced a classic character and that character became good or useful in any way, the 550 meta hoarder/optimizers would throw a tantrum about it, and we know that the devs are terrified of them. Regardless of what some of you feel on rebalance, if you're not for it cool. You don't need to get your thongs twisted because others would welcome it. If you're not for rebalance that's fine, suggest what you are in favor of. One person's opinion doesn't have to delete someone else's, this is just a discussion post after all.
Kolence said: There's definitely power creep. On 5-star side, in match damage and health. On 4-star side, in powers, especially hard counter powers to some meta 4* and 5* abilities. At least that's how I look at it...
Davidk777 said: Personal I would love to see more rebalance characters and I think it would be good for the game. Reason being this is a marvel game. People love the characters they grew up with, and making that character more playable will benefit the game. By spending resource and money so they can play the 1's they want and not the ones they have to. For me that's Wolverine, for others it maybe Ironman. All in all it would make the game funner, which might make the game more money.