Should we keep the Fantastic 4 cover art?

Dragon_Nexus

Yes.

I'm disappointed the people who said "no" haven't commented. I'd have liked to have heard why they're either not a fan of the new art work, or why they enjoyed the old covers more.

Dogface

Yes.

Dragon_Nexus said:

I'm disappointed the people who said "no" haven't commented. I'd have liked to have heard why they're either not a fan of the new art work, or why they enjoyed the old covers more.

I guess it was the computer that said 'no'

ZootSax

Maybe. (Keep some, not others. Comment below =D )

GrimSkald said:

I'm one of the few, apparently, who really like the previous iteration of the Invisible Woman cover.  I thought the composition of it, with the three scenes shot through it, was really cool.  To be fair, however, I'm a fan of Coleen Doran's work.

I liked that one, as well, but both are good.  I didn't like her original cover, so I'm glad that changed.  I don't have strong opinions on any of the others.   

Kolence

No.

Dragon_Nexus said:

I'm disappointed the people who said "no" haven't commented. I'd have liked to have heard why they're either not a fan of the new art work, or why they enjoyed the old covers more.

Fine!

I just feel like the difference in style, from the rest of the in game covers, is what irks me? The characters look too real - like they are drawn after a photograph?

But the portraits are all good, all look quite pretty. If they stayed, I'd probably get used to it without much trouble.

Dragon_Nexus

Yes.

Kolence said:

Dragon_Nexus said:

I'm disappointed the people who said "no" haven't commented. I'd have liked to have heard why they're either not a fan of the new art work, or why they enjoyed the old covers more.

Fine!

I just feel like the difference in style, from the rest of the in game covers, is what irks me? The characters look too real - like they are drawn after a photograph?

But the portraits are all good, all look quite pretty. If they stayed, I'd probably get used to it without much trouble.

It's something I like about the game, the wide variety of comic covers in different styles from different artists.

I see where you're coming from, Artgerm tends to have a more hyper detailed look to them.

AardvarkPepper

Yes.

Kolence said:

Dragon_Nexus said:

I'm disappointed the people who said "no" haven't commented. I'd have liked to have heard why they're either not a fan of the new art work, or why they enjoyed the old covers more.

Fine!

I just feel like the difference in style, from the rest of the in game covers, is what irks me? The characters look too real - like they are drawn after a photograph?

But the portraits are all good, all look quite pretty. If they stayed, I'd probably get used to it without much trouble.

And a bunch of characters (e.g. 3* Starlord) look like they were finger painted or something.

then there's Spider-Ham

IceIX

So, alternate Vision cover?

Daredevil217

IceIX said:

So, alternate Vision cover?

Save that for a 4 or 5* Vision since we learned the 3* is the least played in the tier.

Dragon_Nexus

Yes.

I suggested a new Vision cover a while back.

jamesh

Yes.

IceIX said:

So, alternate Vision cover?

Except it would probably end up with Marvel's scan of the cover, which doesn't look quite as good.