Karn Bundle Card Changes *Updated (5/22/18)
Comments
-
SELECT *
FROM users
WHERE karn='true'
SET crystals = crystals + 60
No receipts necessary...6 -
I'm currently also on the "You broke my trust, am not satisfied, and probably won't get any more of my cash if this is the end of it" team as well as the "Gilded Lotus was the major deciding factor in buying the bundle."
I had even thought to myself two+ weeks prior, "Gee, I wish that they sold a good mana ramp card at a reasonable price."
I would strongly suggest raising the mana cost, perhaps double to 14, so that it could keep its original wording. Many people, including myself, are upset about the drastic change in function - and would be willing to pay more for that function rather than to have a mediocre effect at a mediocre mana cost.
This is a PR fire that isn't going away unless you either listen to your customers or you let the cash bridge burn.0 -
ElfNeedsFood said:SELECT *
FROM users
WHERE karn='true'
SET crystals = crystals + 60
No receipts necessary...
D3 & OKTAGON: This is your mess so it's your responsibility to fix. If I were in this ridiculous situation with my client (had I been able to still collaborate with them after the amount of **** ups you guys are coming up with) I would do everything I could to fix this problem and avoid any more inconveniences for them.
Now, asking me to dig into my inbox for some ridiculous receipt just because you are too lazy to run a script and check it in your own database is just outrageous. Yes, even if karn were available for crystals you have a history of all purchases so you can dig into that... Because of course it was properly implemented making it easy for you to figure out who purchased what. And if it wasn't... Well here's some food for thought.
It's not about the crystals as much as about the despicable gesture and lack of care towards your players.
I am VERY disappointed by this. Shame D3, shame Oktagon.
P. S. For me the nerf is quite a big whatever so please don't interpret my anger as having that as a source. Sure, the card was great and I enjoyed the unerfed version in a few decks but it wasn't doing anything broken for me. It was actually helping newer players MUCH more.8 -
What receipt..? Oo i dont have a receipt...? In any case, as someone mentioned above, would be very easy for you to filter who got the bundle and who didnt in order to compensate those... 80 crystals, which by the way sounds like a joke... a bad one.1
-
So if someone decides to buy the Karn bundle now in light of Gilded Lotus being nerfed or aka 'sent to the scrapyard known as Phyrexia the heck for artifacts' (not my words but from an actual Magic the Gathering book) would they get this refund or does it only apply to those who bought the Karn Planeswalker bundle before this announcement came out?
Very curious and just waiting patiently for my answer because I have not bought with cash anything in game since the boycott began last year.0 -
I do not understand yet why gilded lotus is going to be nerfed.
That explanation do not explain anything to me.
Getting lotus was what decided me to buy the bundle.
First and last time spending cash.
update: if lotus is so broken that needs to be nerfed then the compensation is not high enough, do not think so?5 -
Not very impressed. Poor handling of the situation.
This is not Oktagon as I would have expected. They are boarding the D3 train and it disturbs me greatly.
You guys should know better than that. Be better than your predecessors.4 -
I have no receipt left since it's around month from it so.. How do I get my 80 crystals?0
-
That answer was important, and at least a week too late.. But thank you anyway - don't forget to use the inbox to inform players that are not here as well.In game support is still broken.However, as pointed out a dozen times b: you're changing a great, but not overpowered card to something barely playable. Change the cost or change the bonus, but not both - at least consider our suggestions.4
-
Laeuftbeidir said:Change the cost or change the bonus, but not both - at least consider our suggestions.
They should look into Baral as example for balance. The card was indeed OP and people paid for it with cash. However Baral was not overnerfed to uselessness and the community as a whole was content. Actually the changes to Baral were not nerf per say but more like redisign and many found the new Baral more interesting
0 -
Laeuftbeidir said:That answer was important, and at least a week too late.. But thank you anyway - don't forget to use the inbox to inform players that are not here as well.In game support is still broken.However, as pointed out a dozen times b: you're changing a great, but not overpowered card to something barely playable. Change the cost or change the bonus, but not both - at least consider our suggestions.
And next time, think twice before throwing cards into a cash bundle... me personally will think twice if not more before paying for anything...2 -
In sheer terms of efficiency, Gilded Lotus was nerfed by at least 61% of its original value (originally took 3.5 matches to make up cost, now take 9, this isn't taking into effect the fact that by increasing the cost it is also slowing down other cards that it shared hand space with by eating two more mana). At 2 shields, it doesn't tend to last long due to cascades and the AI having an absolute hard-on for targeting it with every swap it can. If +2 was too good to keep, even with a higher cost, the cost and benefit should both have been reduced - instead it was increased to the point where it's absolute trash. Meanwhile, other cards with much more powerful metas around them have been left totally unchanged (Omniscience, New Perspectives, Hazoret's Undying Fury, etc), so an 80 crystal refund that you have to file a support ticket to receive is just insulting.
The "never getting another dime out of me" crowd was growing because of the nerf, but this "compensation" is only adding fuel to that fire.4 -
Karn was the first time i spent money on mtgpq. And now it was the last time. Lotus was a big reason for buying Karn. Without the Lotus i would have bought it with crystals. And 80 crystals as compensation is a joke. NOT ANOTHER DIME!2
-
bken1234 said:Thuran said:Wait a second!
DOM will be 80 crystals each pack, so a 400 crystal PP? That is snowflaking tinykitty!
Hope it turns out the paragraph was just badly written and not Ocktagon deciding to rip us off worse than they already did by reducing event rewards -_-
Still kudos for giving the crystals, even if i madre my position clear that i dont believe anyonevwjo bought karn deserves Them, and that d3 would be in the right not to give anything.
Way to go above and beyond or way to try and put out the potential PR damage, which it probably is.
I'm sure this is the same case.
Let's wait for @Brigby to clarify when he returns to the office before we jump the gun.0 -
Brakkis said:I would just like to point out that Gilded Lotus's pre-nerf +2 Bonus as a Rare is completely off-set by the Uncommon Dampening Sphere that's being released with Dominaria that has a -2 bonus effect.
Also a player fielding both Damping Sphere + Gilded Lotus would totally crush the opponent since a -2 across the board to your opponent is more significant an advantage than a +2 across the board to yourself.0 -
So... basically the internal philosophy is "consistency is bad and must be nerfed, but loops of cascades are fine." Which creates a stronger negative play experience?
Remember, y'all basically gave every single player The Immortal Sun, which is another potentially negative play experience, because some planeswalkers depend on their abilities to be playable (Koth, I'm looking at you along with all the "energy matters" planeswalkers).
I've had WAY more negative play experiences with things like Olivia and tokens, or Deploy the Gatewatch with the pig as simple examples (also, I get that these are legacy and not likely to be rebalanced soon, and that is fine) than any deck withe lotus. Heck, look to Pyramid of the Pantheon for a mana gainer as a similar option - granted that is a mythic, but why not make the Lotus a mythic if your concern is too many people having it. Or is it perhaps the addition PW loyalty that is causing the perceived imbalance allowing PW to get to their ultimate quicker than desired?
I think your product managers need to sit down and have a user focused conversation on what kind of experience your USERS want, rather than some arbitrary concept of balance. A great technique to use, if you aren't already, is to make up several "User Personas" and then keep those in mind when evaluating your internal balance.
Here is a good starting point. https://www.prodpad.com/blog/how-to-create-great-user-personas/
If you aren't familiar with the concept of Timmy/Tammy, Johnny/Jenny, and Spike - they would be a great kick off point for your personas - Wizards has already done the profiling work for you. https://mtg.gamepedia.com/Player_type
Okay, all that being said, I really like this game a lot, I'm not grabbing a pitchfork, and overall I like the direction that it has been taking, but that doesn't mean I should have a less critical eye toward it - I'm of the personal belief of the opposite. So please, keep making the best game you can but I think that really starts with an understanding of your users.12 -
@pbmtg makes a very good point about negative play experience. I think my biggest annoyance with the Lotus nerf is that it is slowing the game down a lot and that is a huge negative play experience for me. Gilded Lotus literally does nothing on its own. All it does is speed the game up so I'm not slogging through 10 min games sandwiched in between tons of loading and ending encounters and fetching event info and finding new opponent and you get the point. This game is too slow, in all aspects. Gilded Lotus at least sped up game play. I already could win every single game with Ob. Lotus just made that happen faster and less boring.
1 -
ZW2007- said:@pbmtg makes a very good point about negative play experience. I think my biggest annoyance with the Lotus nerf is that it is slowing the game down a lot and that is a huge negative play experience for me. Gilded Lotus literally does nothing on its own. All it does is speed the game up so I'm not slogging through 10 min games sandwiched in between tons of loading and ending encounters and fetching event info and finding new opponent and you get the point. This game is too slow, in all aspects. Gilded Lotus at least sped up game play. I already could win every single game with Ob. Lotus just made that happen faster and less boring.0
-
Gilesclone said:ZW2007- said:@pbmtg makes a very good point about negative play experience. I think my biggest annoyance with the Lotus nerf is that it is slowing the game down a lot and that is a huge negative play experience for me. Gilded Lotus literally does nothing on its own. All it does is speed the game up so I'm not slogging through 10 min games sandwiched in between tons of loading and ending encounters and fetching event info and finding new opponent and you get the point. This game is too slow, in all aspects. Gilded Lotus at least sped up game play. I already could win every single game with Ob. Lotus just made that happen faster and less boring.2
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.8K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.3K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.6K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 503 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 421 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 298 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.6K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements