Ezrius said: I voted for Nightcrawler, just as I have voted for Nightcrawler in every previous poll he was available in and any other instance where a write-in was an option.It saddens me that movie rights can control so much of the decision making for things that aren't directly related to movies but affect the fans most of all. The Marvel Heroes Omega console port removed all mentions of the Fantastic Four and Silver Surfer, and apparently the PC version will be removing the ability to obtain the characters moving forward starting July 1st. I can only hope the X-Men never suffer a similar fate, but things like the recent lack of new X-Men in MPQ and their complete and utter absence in Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite (a series that started as X-Men vs Street Fighter) worry me immensely as an X-Men fan.Edit: For what it's worth, for the new version of an existing, as much as I wanted to put an X-Men, I put Nova, because I want Richard Rider in the game. If I chose an X-Men villain, it would have been Mr. Sinister.
BatteryHorse said: nu I don't want to get into this rabbit hole again, but it was reported a couple of years ago that Ike Perlmutter, the reclusive (many have also added petty, volatile and vindictive to his descriptors) CEO of Marvel Entertainment, was deliberately tanking all Marvel properties that weren't completely owned by Marvel.Ike Perlmutter is a really strange dude, and a simple Google search digs up all kinds of weird stories. He's widely celebrated for bringing Marvel back from the brink of bankruptcy and ultimately selling it to Disney for $4 billion dollars. He was initially in charge of all of Marvel but he and Kevin Feige hated each other. Feige won the power struggle and Perlmutter was given Marvel Entertainment, which is basically everything that isn't the movies. That was a couple of years ago.From that point on Perlmutter decided he wanted to do everything he could to make sure any property not wholly owned by Marvel suffered in hopes that the rights holders would release those rights. They've dramatically reduced toy production, and you'll notice far fewer X-men or Fantastic Four or Spider-man toys, even though Marvel controls the merchandising rights. They killed Wolverine in the comics to try to sabotage Fox's huge cash cow. They cancelled comic runs that had run for decades (and those runs were struggling financially anyway). At Marvel even poor comic titles were considered worth the investment since they were obliquely idea factories for the profitable movies, but they're not interested in generating ideas for another studio's movies.MPQ has to submit character ideas to Marvel before they can develop them, and presumably they have a good relationship. MPQ commented that they had a little fun with Hawkguy and Marvel was open to it, and they created Peggy as an original addition to the game. Marvel is open to innovation, but there's a clear mandate about what they want in their game and what they don't.Interestingly, there have been rumours that Perlmutter has stepped aside/semi-retired. He's old and has some really, really weird legal battles going on that are starting to involve Marvel and Marvel staff and emails in embarrassing ways. It's a story too weird for TV, but it's real. If Perlmutter is out there may be room for new philosophies and new rules. Hard to say. The devs could throw us off by releasing even one X-man or X-man villain. Just one in two years, just so that people didn't feel like there was a blanket prohibition. There are so many glaring omissions that it defies belief that they're just coincidentally skipped. When you're cranking out Riri and Spider-woman and Mordo and a whole holy host of variants and completely ignoring one of the most popular and storied segments of your franchise, it's not an accident.
DarthDeVo said: Ezrius said: ...snip...It saddens me that movie rights can control so much of the decision making for things that aren't directly related to movies but affect the fans most of all. The Marvel Heroes Omega console port removed all mentions of the Fantastic Four and Silver Surfer, and apparently the PC version will be removing the ability to obtain the characters moving forward starting July 1st. I can only hope the X-Men never suffer a similar fate, but things like the recent lack of new X-Men in MPQ and their complete and utter absence in Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite (a series that started as X-Men vs Street Fighter) worry me immensely as an X-Men fan....snip... I've casually read a lot about this particular issue over the years. My memory could be fuzzy, but I don't know if anyone from Marvel has ever officially said on the record that as a company they're intentionally gimping the Fantastic Four and X-Men due to the fact that giving them promotion of any kind in any medium somehow benefits Fox on the big screen....snip...The only problem was, comic book sales TANKED for Marvel with few X-Men titles, which had typically been some of their strongest performing titles. Hence the ResurreXion event that brought them back into prominence....snip..
Ezrius said: ...snip...It saddens me that movie rights can control so much of the decision making for things that aren't directly related to movies but affect the fans most of all. The Marvel Heroes Omega console port removed all mentions of the Fantastic Four and Silver Surfer, and apparently the PC version will be removing the ability to obtain the characters moving forward starting July 1st. I can only hope the X-Men never suffer a similar fate, but things like the recent lack of new X-Men in MPQ and their complete and utter absence in Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite (a series that started as X-Men vs Street Fighter) worry me immensely as an X-Men fan....snip...
Beer40 said: Speaking of X-Men being back, I didn't follow comics for awhile after AvX. I came back recently right around the new crossover where Doom becomes God. What happened to Hope? She was the "mutant messiah" and I haven't seen her at all. It seems kind of in line with the above posts of Marvel sabotaging the mutants. The story line where Cyclops gathered up everyone he could find to protect Hope from Bastion was one of my all time favorites. I really thought the X books were going to new heights and then its kind of all went downhill from there with various killings of mutants that were more about "splash" than substance.
Listen, I don't want to go crazy getting into it, and I hope you'll be okay with me only including a small part of your post that I'd like to directly address (I don't like cluttering up the forum with gigantic walls of quotes within quotes in order to respond to two sentences, etc). I want to touch on the two paragraphs, particularly, though, and the new quote system drives me bananas with formatting.Marvel would not benefit from officially stating, "Oh yeah, we're tanking your favorite characters and trying to minimize their exposure in order to devalue them." Directly admitting to that would be a complete insane blunder from a business standpoint, and further alienate fans. It would literally be a Marvel spokesperson saying, "We don't care what you want; you have to learn to like what we want you to like." Not issuing an official statement doesn't mean they aren't doing it. It benefits them because if they limit exposure of the characters to weaken recognition and popularity, they would hope to have the X-Men movie franchise have missteps similar to the Fantastic Four. Put characters in video games not to satisfy returning fans, you already have them, put characters you want to promote (from movie rights you control) in the game to expose and familiarize potential new fans to them in the hopes that they'll like the characters and later be interested when they hear about upcoming movies featuring them. It's all about those new fans, not the existing ones.As far as X-Men titles tanking... it really depends on when you're talking about. I thought the early 2000s were crazy for X-Men. Snip...
Darknes21 said: Did the X-men ever leave? If I was a mod this topic would be moved to characters section....we can't have the General discussion section being over loaded! @Ducky
Chrono_Tata said:Actually this is just a thing that Marvel does with all their characters across the board, not just X-Men.They killed off Bruce Banner (replaced with Cho). Killed War Machine. Killed Tony Stark (replaced with Riri). Depowered Thor for a while and replaced with Jane Foster. Depowered Cap and replaced with Falcap, then bring him back as a Hydra version. So if you take them killing off/replacing characters as a sign of sabotaging the IP, then evidently they must be trying to sabotage the Avengers as well, which is clearly not the case.