bbigler said: I disagree. Even without the required 4*, you are still able to play the PVE and win their progression reward cover. If you don't have all 4*s rostered, then you can't expect to compete at a high level in PVE.Also, the point of vaulting is to stop dilution in the legendary pool. The devs want you to roster all characters.If they want us to roster them all then they should give us access to all of them. If they want to vault them, they should just get rid of them period. At least then it would some sense. Collect them all when they are not available is just pure stupid. Maybe the Dev team should be required to take an IQ and sanity test. If they really think what they are doing here is a good idea there is a good chance they fail both.
that would be a shame, my 2/1/2 Ant-Man would love whatever cover he could get
MarkersMake said: So... Maybe I don't understand the logic, but why are the essential characters for a PVE also the rewards for THAT PvE? Wouldn't it make more sense for the reward covers in the current PvE be the essentials for the next PvE?
Wumpushunter said: All that disagreed basically said one of 2 things, I have the 4s already heck with those that don't or well you can still get progression. My topic was about placement not progression.
morph3us said: MarkersMake said: So... Maybe I don't understand the logic, but why are the essential characters for a PVE also the rewards for THAT PvE? Wouldn't it make more sense for the reward covers in the current PvE be the essentials for the next PvE? They're placement rewards for the previous PvE, and progression rewards for the current PvE.
Wumpushunter said: The point of vaulting is to stop roster dilution but making these characters much harder to obtain should you then demand people have those same chacters to truly compete in pve placement? I for one believe they should remove all vaulted characters from essential lists for pve.
MarkersMake said: morph3us said: MarkersMake said: So... Maybe I don't understand the logic, but why are the essential characters for a PVE also the rewards for THAT PvE? Wouldn't it make more sense for the reward covers in the current PvE be the essentials for the next PvE? They're placement rewards for the previous PvE, and progression rewards for the current PvE. Yes, I know. (EDIT - you're right, I wasn't clear which rewards I was referring to) But shouldn't it be the other way around? Look, if you don't already have the 4* character for the current PvE then you cannot win the 4* placement reward. You just can't. By the time you reach that 4* progression reward you are well out of the running. So that means that for the NEXT PvE you also cannot win the 4* placement award, for the same reason, (unless you happen to already have it rostered). Vaulting makes that much less likely, particularly for newer players. Stop me when you see a pattern here. What would be the harm in reversing the placement and progression rewards? ie Current progression reward = next essential. Current essential = current placement reward.