New McG said: beyonderbub said: 10 out of 10 each and every time. If I play it, why wouldn't I recommend it? Everything else one can adapt to and get over it. Still progressing and having fun. I'm not sure how long you've been playing, but I think if you started a brand new account right now, you'd be startled by how behind you'd be.
beyonderbub said: 10 out of 10 each and every time. If I play it, why wouldn't I recommend it? Everything else one can adapt to and get over it. Still progressing and having fun.
beyonderbub said: New McG said: beyonderbub said: 10 out of 10 each and every time. If I play it, why wouldn't I recommend it? Everything else one can adapt to and get over it. Still progressing and having fun. I'm not sure how long you've been playing, but I think if you started a brand new account right now, you'd be startled by how behind you'd be. Day 1182. I started behind and will always be behind players who pay more and play more but if that is the criteria for deciding to play this game, then no one would ever play. That's seems to be the inherent problem here. Forumites too worried about everyone else's progress, their store offers aren't the same, who's cheating, who's climbing on cupcakes and posting negative views on the game that they don't see the only solution to all their in-game problems is "just play the game". You're not going to earn any more resources by posting here. People post things here as if their opinions were fact and apply to everyone when the truth is their posts usually only apply to their current level and game situation. Believe it or not, I started a second acct on Steam one year after my mobile acct and built it up to have its own 3*s champed. I just stopped recently bc mobile accts had more rewards and it became too much time to keep progressing on both. So yes my Steam acct is behind but so what? I still enjoyed all those hours I played that acct. Being behind in this game is a fact of life for most on here, in my opinion.
metallion said:One of the huge draws of this game is the massive amount of characters playable in this game, and immediately locking out almost 3/4 of the characters that actually matter the moment a new players starts the game for the first time isn't going to retain new players, since they'll eventually realise they'll never even come close to catching up to the vets.
AlluAllu said: metallion said:One of the huge draws of this game is the massive amount of characters playable in this game, and immediately locking out almost 3/4 of the characters that actually matter the moment a new players starts the game for the first time isn't going to retain new players, since they'll eventually realise they'll never even come close to catching up to the vets. Yes, I can understand how that irritates the completionists. To see something you can't realistically achieve. And it indeed is a race against time. Ibelieve you when you wouldn't recommend that to others. But there are 3 stages of the game before 4-stars. Are those 3 stages not fun enough to be worth a recommendation? I remember when I was a newbie that 1-star Spider-Man in particular was fun. Little webs here and there, and whammo! Suddenly 4 critical tiles! That was awesome. I understand how people are disappointed in the game that they are currently playing. But I just wonder if you have forgotten those early days that got you playing this in the first place.
AlluAllu said: Fair point about vaulted 3-stars. But aside from completionist view point, is rostering and building all 3-stars really necessary to enjoy this game? 20 characters should give one sufficiently diverse roster so that they don't get bored playing. I do agree that the move from 3-stars to 4-stars takes more playing time than it in any way should, but it's not like the game is forcing us to do it. Aside from "collect them all", there isn't any actual end point. Champing all available 3-stars is a nice place to quit and it should be achievable in reasonable time. Buuut... writing this reply made me understand that perhaps some new players would like to earn a high placement on leaderboards. In that case, yeah, absolutely not recommended. That ship has sailed. But if I were to sum my thoughts, this is how I'd recommend the game: "You'll never get to experience all characters fully, and you wont find yourself at the top of leaderboards. But you will get a fun Marvel-variation of a match-3-game with brilliantly addicting roster-building mechanics that stay fun from couple of months to a year-ish. "