losdamianos wrote: @Ohboy You cant say 20k players cant squeeze into top 15 coalitions Im pretty sure big chunk of them have made deliberate choice of playing more casually and are not chasing bigger rewards actively.
madwren wrote: I'd also say that the responsibility falls on the individual person to excel, and while I certainly disagree with disadvantaging the lower tiers and casual players, those who put in the extra time to research, practice, organize, and participate have earned rewards commensurate with said effort.
Ampmp11 wrote: Personally I'm waiting to see what the changes are before I move on. I want to see if my time and effort will be rewarded properly.
Ampmp11 wrote: 3 - 4 mythics a week maybe too much for top players. 2 mythics a week though should be passable or 2 pulls at that elite pack a week would be fine.
Matthew wrote: Ampmp11 wrote: Personally I'm waiting to see what the changes are before I move on. I want to see if my time and effort will be rewarded properly. I'm in the same boat. I'm going to wait until the second half of the Amonkhet block drops. If they haven't figured things out by then, then they'll lose me.
madwren wrote: Matthew wrote: Ampmp11 wrote: Personally I'm waiting to see what the changes are before I move on. I want to see if my time and effort will be rewarded properly. I'm in the same boat. I'm going to wait until the second half of the Amonkhet block drops. If they haven't figured things out by then, then they'll lose me. Likewise. To be honest, if not for my excellent coalition, I'd probably have just quit already. That being said, I realize that we're dealing with a cruise ship rather than a speedboat, and changing direction takes time. I'm just hoping they do so, as the game really has a lot of potential that's being squandered. Just the other day, I was re-reading the patch notes from last year's big BFZ rebalancing, where a lot of cards were adjusted:https://d3go.com/big-magic-puzzle-quest-1-5-update/ At that time, I really felt a lot of optimism and hope that the creators would not only be communicating with us regularly, but also be closely monitoring power levels and making adjustments as necessary on an ongoing basis, and demonstrating a commitment to a fair and balanced game environment. I'm not sure what changed.
Brigby wrote: toastie wrote: Thank you for the prompt response Brigby. It would be greatly appreciated if you could voice some of these concerns in the meeting and try to get us some answers. We definitely understand that information about future patches can change, we are not expecting nothing you tell us to change, we just want increased transparency in the development process, especially when it comes to polarizing updates like this. The bug status and development feature status lists are excellent ideas, and will be much appreciated. Of course! I'll be sure to relay the community's current concerns to the developers, and see what their thoughts and/or plans to address them are. shteev wrote: It's great to hear that there are only 6 bugs left in the game! *ahem* "I've created this list below to keep track of various issues that players have reported in the Bugs & Technical Issues thread ... PS. This list is currently incomplete, but I will gradually add all the current bug reports to it. (Takes a bit of time to search and add everything)"
toastie wrote: Thank you for the prompt response Brigby. It would be greatly appreciated if you could voice some of these concerns in the meeting and try to get us some answers. We definitely understand that information about future patches can change, we are not expecting nothing you tell us to change, we just want increased transparency in the development process, especially when it comes to polarizing updates like this. The bug status and development feature status lists are excellent ideas, and will be much appreciated.
shteev wrote: It's great to hear that there are only 6 bugs left in the game!
madwren said: Matthew wrote: Ampmp11 wrote: Personally I'm waiting to see what the changes are before I move on. I want to see if my time and effort will be rewarded properly. I'm in the same boat. I'm going to wait until the second half of the Amonkhet block drops. If they haven't figured things out by then, then they'll lose me. Likewise. To be honest, if not for my excellent coalition, I'd probably have just quit already. That being said, I realize that we're dealing with a cruise ship rather than a speedboat, and changing direction takes time. I'm just hoping they do so, as the game really has a lot of potential that's being squandered. Just the other day, I was re-reading the patch notes from last year's big BFZ rebalancing, where a lot of cards were adjusted:https://d3go.com/big-magic-puzzle-quest-1-5-update/ At that time, I really felt a lot of optimism and hope that the creators would not only be communicating with us regularly, but also be closely monitoring power levels and making adjustments as necessary on an ongoing basis, and demonstrating a commitment to a fair and balanced game environment. I'm not sure what changed.
wink said: Me too. I've been treading water since the update: not opening packs, not leveling pws, just waiting for the 2.0 update to see if the devs have listened and figure out if it'll be worth continuing to play.
shteev said: wink said: Me too. I've been treading water since the update: not opening packs, not leveling pws, just waiting for the 2.0 update to see if the devs have listened and figure out if it'll be worth continuing to play. There's no new gameplay content in 2.0 as far as I can tell, just UI updates.