Warbringa wrote: Really surprised Switch's rated one of the 3 worst in the game!?! If you have it at five it is really, really good in PvE for gaining AP and board control/tile removal. Yes that means you need to reduce other covers and I reduce her to 3 because I can normally pair her up with a better power than her own. Her is only mediocre in my opinion, her purple generation is her key ability. I often pair her with Blade, IF or DP who have much better purple powers than her. That allows you to fully utilize her power. I think this is an issue where people only look at with 3 covers, in which case yes it is a bad power as are many of the powers at 3 covers.
Houtro wrote: Done! Damn so many great passives, that one was hard to pick
Pylgrim wrote: UPDATE Well it's been two weeks and 300 people have participated in the poll so far. Unfortunately, as I mentioned in another post, SurveyMonkey cuts off results at 100 count for the free accounts. It's a well hidden limitation that I only noticed once we were over that mark and probably I wouldn't have used the platform if I knew in advance. Nevertheless, that's how it is and there are two options to go from here: The first is to just use the 100-people results. The second is to get a one-month subscription to SM (AU$24) to see the results (and perhaps take advantage of it and make several other polls). Problem is that right now I cannot afford it and I don't even know if it would provide that much value for the community anyway. What do you people think?
Crowl wrote: Maybe there is a simpler solution to the problem, use the 100-people results as effectively choosing the finalists and put up polls on here for each category.
chaos01 wrote: Crowl wrote: Maybe there is a simpler solution to the problem, use the 100-people results as effectively choosing the finalists and put up polls on here for each category. This is a great idea. If you need any help I can do it later today.
Meander wrote: These are pretty interesting, and I wonder on some of the results if people were trolling or misclicked? IE, who put Jab Jab Punch as one of the worst black abilities, or whiteout a worst green? Someone either made a mistake or is really bad at this game.
Pylgrim wrote: 29 Energy Absorption (3* Captain Marvel) 1-4 = -3 30 Adamantium Bones (2* Bullseye) 2-9 = -7 31 Healing & Heat (2* and 3* Daken) 1-10 = -9 31 Spider-Sense (3* Spider-Man) 0-9 = -9 33 Insult to Injury (Dr. Octopus) 2-13 = -11 33 Seeing Red (Red Hulk) 2-13 = -11 35 Supersonic (Quicksilver) 2-14 = -12 36 Raging Tempest (2* Storm) 2-16 = -14 37 Life of the Party (3* Deadpool) 4-21 = -17 38 Master of the Fantastic (Mr. Fantastic) 0-29 = -29 38 Healing Factor (2* Wolverine) 0-29 = -29 40 Alien Instincts (Carnage) 1-32 = -31 41 Give and Take (4* Venom) 0-32 = -32
Meander wrote: Pylgrim wrote: 29 Energy Absorption (3* Captain Marvel) 1-4 = -3 30 Adamantium Bones (2* Bullseye) 2-9 = -7 31 Healing & Heat (2* and 3* Daken) 1-10 = -9 31 Spider-Sense (3* Spider-Man) 0-9 = -9 33 Insult to Injury (Dr. Octopus) 2-13 = -11 33 Seeing Red (Red Hulk) 2-13 = -11 35 Supersonic (Quicksilver) 2-14 = -12 36 Raging Tempest (2* Storm) 2-16 = -14 37 Life of the Party (3* Deadpool) 4-21 = -17 38 Master of the Fantastic (Mr. Fantastic) 0-29 = -29 38 Healing Factor (2* Wolverine) 0-29 = -29 40 Alien Instincts (Carnage) 1-32 = -31 41 Give and Take (4* Venom) 0-32 = -32 After delving further into the results, I find this part fascinating. Some of these are deserved (Give and Take, Seeing Red), but I've never thought to myself that tempest, Alien instincts, healing factor, energy absorption or Supersonic were awful. And Insult to Injury is nearly the only reason I ever play with Doc Oc. Clearly a lot of these are spite votes (Alien Instincts, Adamantium Bones), but I would have expected the truly bad abilities (Fantastic, Seeing Red) or the underpowered ones (Spider Sense, LotP) take over.