No more heroes for a while, please

2

Comments

  • Mawtful
    Mawtful Posts: 1,646 Chairperson of the Boards
    gobstopper wrote:
    Zhirrzh wrote:
    Eh, new heroes are the lifeblood of the game and HP for roster slots may well be the #1 way the devs get people to spend real money on the game, not too worried.

    I wouldn't mind if a few more of the new heroes were 2* though. Since The Hunt we've had, what:
    2*: Ares
    3*: Punisher, Hulk, Patch, Daredevil and now Psylocke

    All these new 3* heroes just make it harder and harder to get enough covers for any one 3* hero to make them viable to use. Meanwhile I would think that most players who've been around more than a month or 6 weeks have at least 80% of the 2* covers already.
    Either Daredevil or Psylocke should've been 2*, probably Dd

    Yeah. I'm actually really looking forward to the next 2* character - hopefully it'll be someone to take some of the workload off poor oBW.
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    I'd prolly prefer a new 2-star over a 3-star, but I think the game could use a countdown based 3-star. Hood's intimidation is pretty pointless atm. Give him the Loki treatment.
  • Spencer75
    Spencer75 Posts: 232
    ihearthawthats wrote:
    I'd prolly prefer a new 2-star over a 3-star, but I think the game could use a countdown based 3-star. Hood's intimidation is pretty pointless atm. Give him the Loki treatment.


    You mean like IM40?
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    Thanks for the comments.

    My main concern is this (as a free player that want's to spend on a pack but not yet):

    1: Not having at least 1 cover for a character now is a big issue. That means you can't enter some "ESSENTIAL" missions, and that might cost you a good placement.
    2: Not having enough HP to buy more roster slots =(

    I'm having fun again since last event, but lost some progression here and there cause of that...
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    Yep, with slots costing 400+ it becomes unfair to shell out new heroes so often.

    Unless certainly you add a winnable '+1 roster slot' token to the mix, having that I'm all in for new heroes. icon_e_smile.gif
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    gobstopper wrote:
    Either Daredevil or Psylocke should've been 2*, probably Dd

    Yep, DD looks more like * to me as he is, ** if he left the traps working when dawned...
  • NighteyesGrisu
    NighteyesGrisu Posts: 563 Critical Contributor
    pasa_ wrote:
    Yep, with slots costing 400+ it becomes unfair to shell out new heroes so often.

    Unless certainly you add a winnable '+1 roster slot' token to the mix, having that I'm all in for new heroes. icon_e_smile.gif

    why unfair? the bigger your roster the bigger your flexibility to kick out some 1* in favour of a new hero. I currently have 31 slots, and only one of them I paid for with real money..the rest I bought with HP earned in game...

    and if push comes to shove, I could still kick out yelena, bagman, venom, etc...
  • kensterr
    kensterr Posts: 1,277 Chairperson of the Boards
    What's unfair is that the game is gender biased. How many female *** are there right now compared to male? XD
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    kensterr wrote:
    What's unfair is that the game is gender biased. How many female *** are there right now compared to male? XD

    Agreed. I'm waiting for the time when I can field a viable 3-woman team. OBW and Psylocke don't look like they work very well together, sadly.

    Let's get a female tank like Ms Marvel or She-Hulk!
  • kensterr
    kensterr Posts: 1,277 Chairperson of the Boards
    Celerity wrote:
    kensterr wrote:
    What's unfair is that the game is gender biased. How many female *** are there right now compared to male? XD

    Agreed. I'm waiting for the time when I can field a viable 3-woman team. OBW and Psylocke don't look like they work very well together, sadly.

    Let's get a female tank like Ms Marvel or She-Hulk!
    Or a utility/tank like Rogue! Superstrength + Leech (just imagine the animation for this is her kissing the screen!). **** would be Phoenix... but I think with that sort of powers she should be ***** instead.

    Others would be Emma Frost, X-23, Scarlet Witch, Polaris or even Mystique (her powers mimic opposing team's powers). So many female characters to choose from!



    Make Mine Marvel!
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    Thanks for ignoring my suggestions and adding Black Panther, d3.

    Game is becoming unmanageable and I've still have to get Loki and X-Force Wolvie. Now, to farm more Hero Points...
  • Nemek
    Nemek Posts: 1,511
    Yes, thank you for ignoring OP's suggestion.
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    Nemek wrote:
    Yes, thank you for ignoring OP's suggestion.

    icon_lol.gif beat me to it
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    kensterr wrote:
    Make Mine Marvel!

    Quite honestly, DC's writing is way better at this point. Marvel's output has been lacking in recent years.
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    To be fair, I feel for someguy on this one. If he doesn't want black panther that makes him a racist...lol...so he* HAS* to try and get him.
  • octagon69
    octagon69 Posts: 33 Just Dropped In
    Black Panther better be a 2 * because making it all 3* for more HP usage for the abilities is a bit greedy.

    I now adding hero's and therfore cover space pays the bills for them. But non stop 3 * is a bit much.
  • Jathro
    Jathro Posts: 323 Mover and Shaker
    Zhirrzh wrote:
    Eh, new heroes are the lifeblood of the game and HP for roster slots may well be the #1 way the devs get people to spend real money on the game, not too worried.

    I wouldn't mind if a few more of the new heroes were 2* though. Since The Hunt we've had, what:
    2*: Ares
    3*: Punisher, Hulk, Patch, Daredevil and now Psylocke

    All these new 3* heroes just make it harder and harder to get enough covers for any one 3* hero to make them viable to use. Meanwhile I would think that most players who've been around more than a month or 6 weeks have at least 80% of the 2* covers already.
    I agree.

    Also, adding more 2-star characters would be arguably more beneficial for newer players as they transition from 1 to 2 star teams. 3 stars are fun and all, but there should be a variety as well.
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    I wish they would balance the existing characters before they kept adding all these new ones! We don't have the iso / HP to level them anyways! slow it down on the new guys!
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    sms4002 wrote:
    I wish they would balance the existing characters before they kept adding all these new ones! We don't have the iso / HP to level them anyways! slow it down on the new guys!

    We've went over this.
    Haven't you seen the commercial with the goofy guy and the little kids?
    More is better.
    They can balance covers and add new 1's simultaneously. There very well could be balances happening right along with everything else today.
  • Unknown
    Unknown
    The cover cost is the problem? Are you kidding? How about stop adding new characters until scaling is fixed. The cost is nothing, I can build up the few hundred I need in the time I have, I'm just tired of losing characters I should've won because of scaling.

Categories