puppychow wrote: whenever Antman pvp comes out, we'll see how much using loaners matter in placement. chances are, most players will choose a 3-colored loaner over their 1 pink covered antman.
Nicholas Hewitt wrote: I got to 1128 and came 8th on the Thing PVP with a loaner Thing. It's definitely more about the other two characters you bring to the fight, but having a usable featured is never a bad thing.
pinky wrote: These days it seems PVP is all about the featured and weekly boosted characters. if you have a well covered, high level roster of boosted guys, then you're in the running. otherwise, the chances of scoring or finishing decently seems bleak. So I was just wondering, how high have you guys managed to reach when your roster does not have a well covered and high level (say, above 140) featured character? is it even possible to compete for placement rewards or to get the 800 or 1000 progression reward? for eg, for this cyclops event, I happen to have an unusable cyclops (lvl 40, 1/1/2). I seem to have great difficulty climbing even with my other 2 166 blade and patch. my shortfall is that my roster only has maybe 5-6 high level 3s, and when those are not boosted pvp seems impossible.
IlDuderino wrote: Running a level 70 loaner is like carrying a neon flashing sign saying "Hit Me" when you get above a certain point threshold. Even where the featured is a terrible character, the loaner means a much shorter match. Exception is where virtually no-one will have a useable character, e.g. first Thing PvP, as in this case you won't stand out from the majority who also carry a loaner.
san-mpq wrote: IlDuderino wrote: Running a level 70 loaner is like carrying a neon flashing sign saying "Hit Me" when you get above a certain point threshold. Even where the featured is a terrible character, the loaner means a much shorter match. Exception is where virtually no-one will have a useable character, e.g. first Thing PvP, as in this case you won't stand out from the majority who also carry a loaner. This. I look for anyone with a level 70 loaner (or anything less than max), and I tend to check their roster to see whether they really lack one completely (in which case I hit, hit, hit), or whether they are just using the loaner at this point due to health packs (I do this sometimes, saving my good character for later matches, especially if they aren't full 166s yet).Loaners are meant to allow people to play the game and get decent rewards (top 100 is still very plausible), not necessarily to compete for top spots. In the latest event, my 290 level allowed me to compete for top 5 - other times, I take my top 100 spot and am quite happy with that. Now, that took a while to build, and is one of the 13 166s I have now. However, I recall a time not too long ago when I had barely any - if you are in that category, simply keep going. This game is a marathon, not a sprint.
downsouthman1 wrote: That would be me. I currently have only 2 characters that are covered well enough to be 166s, but lack the ISO. So I keep playing. Also, I don't level that way anyway. I level from lowest level character to highest level character, that way my entire roster grows. I do use the loaner fairly frequently when I'm recovering my main.
san-mpq wrote: downsouthman1 wrote: That would be me. I currently have only 2 characters that are covered well enough to be 166s, but lack the ISO. So I keep playing. Also, I don't level that way anyway. I level from lowest level character to highest level character, that way my entire roster grows. I do use the loaner fairly frequently when I'm recovering my main. Keep it up, you'll get there quicker than I did. I am almost at a year mark (yay, Devil Dino! x3), and have most of the 3*s mostly covered, though many not optimally. In terms of levelling, it's really based on what you want to do. I levelled a couple to as far as I could, as fast as I could. The ones I focused on that got me most bang for my buck were patch (amazing during the 5 health pack era where that was a premium), deadpool (a very good scarecrow because of his red), blade (green/purple death) and hood (obvious reason). Once I got to top 100 consistently, I just continued to keep at it, using the loaner as an extra health pack. I actually still do this, even when I have a max level character (including in the cyclops event) - I do it because the computer on defence will still select your top character, and on offence, you minimize the chance of the top guy getting hurt early by seed teams and weak teams.
san-mpq wrote: I just continued to keep at it, using the loaner as an extra health pack. I actually still do this, even when I have a max level character (including in the cyclops event) - I do it because the computer on defence will still select your top character, and on offence, you minimize the chance of the top guy getting hurt early by seed teams and weak teams.
dr tinykittylove wrote: puppychow wrote: whenever Antman pvp comes out, we'll see how much using loaners matter in placement. chances are, most players will choose a 3-colored loaner over their 1 pink covered antman. And then the crazy pve grinders will come out and be all "fear my 5 cover antman rawr"...
san-mpq wrote: <snip> I just continued to keep at it, using the loaner as an extra health pack. I actually still do this, even when I have a max level character (including in the cyclops event) - I do it because the computer on defence will still select your top character, and on offence, you minimize the chance of the top guy getting hurt early by seed teams and weak teams.