enough with the nerfing talk

Unknown

this topic has gone green. bump^

Unknown

Agent Alex wrote:

I understand it can be frustrating to be stuck in a 4* wall
But the 2*-3* transition was painful as well, and no 2* can beat a full 3*
The indication that comes from this is simple, if you cant beat it, you need to work the progression until it becomes accesible (And this comes from someone that suffered it as well)
The inclusion of more 4* will force a new transition, that's all, no need to cry nerf

as for future ones, I would like to think most of them are leaders (exception being IW), of SHIELD, Guardians of Galaxy, of the Hand (although this would apply to both Elektra and Gorgon) and so on... so i'm looking forward to Iron Patriot as 4*

Even at the 166 wall there was a trickle of 3*s coming in that would eventually turn into something good with enough time and patience. The 4* wall is not the same. There rate of 4*s earned as a mid level 3* player hoping to one day transition up is so abysmally low you really stop and start to question if eventually is really never. They can regularly earn 3*s but more and more 3*s is not the path to overcoming the 4* wall. This is why the 2-4* transition is a real thing. Once daily rewards go out for x-force you can put all your resources into him and be better off than anyone trying to build up a 3* roster normally, and that is not how it "should" be.

Unknown

Spoit wrote:

Clearly is the 4* IM

I have never wanted anyone to be more correct...but why on earth has it taken so long? IP should have been one of the first 4* characters, but here we are pushing day 500 of the game, with Dark Reign as a storyline having been mostly abandoned...what the hell, developers?

Oh, and no nerfing. TGT isn't Ragnarok, or CMAGS, or stun-lock Spidey. She isn't even half of Sentry/Hood.

SnowcaTT

Nellyson wrote:

The reason we're hearing all this nerf talk is because there aren't a lot of 4 characters yet. So because of this, the same two are constantly used. Just look at all the 3 options we have. It's actually quite incredible. I sometimes have a very hard time choosing who to play. So all that needs to happen is the release of more 4 and the ability to get their covers at a better rate. With the PVP rewarding a 4 at 1K, I think it'll be easier to get the covers for them, just not the iso. Which of course they're in the process of making more iso available. So honestly, no nerf is needed until 4 land sucks and no new people are better than Sexy Thor (4hor, i just like Sexy Thor better! haha). So really, as long as the new 4 characters don't pull a I think there should be no reason to nerf anything.

As I've thought on it longer, this is my opinion on the matter as well. Again, I'm of the belief 3*'s shouldn't be able to regularly take out 4*'s any more than 2*'s can regularly take out 3*'s. I think much (not all!) of the complaining has come from those who have finally achieved a decent 3* roster - and the game is now moving to 4*'s finally being good.

There are 7 4*'s - two are great, one or two are fine (Fury? Maybe Starlord?), three aren't that great (IW, Elektra, Dino)

There are 33 3*'s - we can debate all day what levels they fall in, I'll just split them in thirds (11 each of great/fine/poor)

If there were more 4*'s, you'd have more of "these are the best and everywhere" to complain about. I think the larger complaints should be the 4*'s that are bad - the worst three 166's still (probably) take out 94 Daken/OBW/Ares based in large part to differences in health alone. Buffs need to be looked at more than nerfs - in 3* range as well!

Unknown

If I'm understanding correctly, what we need is a 5* that needs 1.2 million ISO to max. Then, 4*'s would be put in their place, so we could start the movement to nerf the 5* for being more powerful than the 4*.