RIP 2* - 3*. Long live the 2* - 4* Transition.

2»

Comments

  • yogi_
    yogi_ Posts: 1,236 Chairperson of the Boards
    I was going to start another thread but my thought ties into this.

    I am transitioning to a fuller 3* roster and actually don't have very many 4* covers which is actually fine with me. I have the half covered IW, XF and a few Dinos (which to be honest, I would be ok with not having, as I would rather have the roster space), but none of the others.

    Now... I had a spot for Squirrel Girl ready, but just got my first Elektra cover, so she had to use that. Though I am happy to have it, I semi wish the Elektra cover I just got was a useful 3* cover.

    In some respects, I am actually quite ok with not really getting 4* covers right now and if there was sort of a way of not having access to them, I would seriously think about taking it until I felt ready to move into them. I would like a token that removed the 4*'s but increased the 3's. Hardly getting enough 3* covers, but that is a different thread.

    Given the 4* are just sort of emerging into high level 3*s (kinda), what do people think about the opinion of transitioning rosters actually not pushing for 4* covers?

    url=http://www.d3pforums.com/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=20488]My concept for a much cleaner 1* - 3* game[/url.
  • Spoit
    Spoit Posts: 3,441 Chairperson of the Boards
    simonsez wrote:
    Spoit wrote:
    I duno what kind of bracket you're in, only 2 of my top 10 actually have any 166s, much less a maxed fury
    Maybe I'm farther along, so scaling has caught up with guys like that?
    It ended up being 3 at the end, because Polarity was hiding to use the RB icon_lol.gif

Categories