mjh wrote: Yet again another character release on the horizon. This issue is not solved. DDQ is not the solution. It's barely a band-aid fix.
mjh wrote: With the ever increasing barrage of new characters being introduced faster than we can get a decent amount of covers for let alone the to level I find it detrimental that roster slots exponentially cost more. Even if they do slow down with the introduction of new characters, the fact that you must purchase a roster slot still remains. How can D3 promote that we should have roster diversity and compete for new characters if you make it infinitely increasingly expensive to add new characters? It's come to the point where I am seeing people selling/considering selling 3 characters to make room for new ones. This is ridiculous and getting out of hand.
Teno1 wrote: Someone in another post had a great idea, to make the slot prices depending on the star rarity of the character. 1* 25 hp 2* 150 hp 3* 400 hp 4* 700 hp Per slot
DFiPL wrote: Teno1 wrote: Someone in another post had a great idea, to make the slot prices depending on the star rarity of the character. 1* 25 hp 2* 150 hp 3* 400 hp 4* 700 hp Per slot How would you handle that? Have the purchaser select a tier when they buy the slot, and then only characters of that tier can go in there? If they made that change, would pre-filled slots get tied to that tier? If you had a 1* on your roster, would you be locked in to only ever being able to have a 1* in that slot?
El Satanno wrote: mjh wrote: Yet again another character release on the horizon. This issue is not solved. DDQ is not the solution. It's barely a band-aid fix. Umm...you're waiting for Godot, holmes. They've made it pretty clear that roster slot costs are not a problem in their eyes. And I can see their logic. Just let it go. The only thing that will likely change their minds is when the game hits that tipping point that people start dropping out left and right because of it.
TLCstormz wrote: I know that this is the day and age of disc locked content / downloadable content, but still there is no way in Hades that a character should EVER cost you $5. I voted for 400, because $5 is like 550 in this game correct? And even if a super awesome character is an okay expense at $5 for a Playstation or an Xbox, this is an app.......on our telephones. lol. Not only that, but you also may be spending that $5 on a freaking 2* that is an essential or even a 1* (eventually), which is in no way shape or form worth $5, to begin with. A mess.
SnowcaTT wrote: May video: We're capping roster slots "where players feel it's comfortable". Um....1K is not what people are voting/saying is comfortable.
djsquillz wrote: SnowcaTT wrote: May video: We're capping roster slots "where players feel it's comfortable". Um....1K is not what people are voting/saying is comfortable. Just like their definition of "Fun" is unrecognizable to most of us "Comfortable" probably means something different to them too. marc