JSP869 said: because what's good for the veterans is good for D3/Demi.
ThaRoadWarrior said: JSP869 said: because what's good for the veterans is good for D3/Demi. As a blanket statement, I'm not entirely sure I'd agree with that. I do agree the feeder system needs an overhaul though - there is no reason any 4* should be multi-fed. Limited characters (bag-man included) need to be giving out appropriate rewards. It took longer to max-champ my bag-man than it did to champ 5* Ghost rider. Yes, some players may have them at better levels than organically available peers, but you can't bonus them. Even Magikarp has Gyardos to look forward to eventually.At a glance, it seems like multi-feeding 5*s would be great, but in practice, i'm not entirely sure it would make a big difference with dilution being what it is. Since the best way to grow a 4* is to just pick one and never move your BH, it wouldn't be materially different time-wise than just growing a dupe I don't imagine.
JSP869 said: If the covers were not rewarded retroactively (as currently happens when a four-star is updated to feed a 5-star) that may upset veterans players with Champion 2* and 3* characters who may think they're entitled to receive the reward covers they would have otherwise got. First, nobody is entitled to anything that is not already currently in the game. Am I entitled to receive a Legendary Token or a 5-star cover from my Champion 4-stars as they hit 280, or 300, and so on? Yes, I am, because those rewards are already in the game. What I am NOT entitled to are Champion rewards that got updated. It's a nice gesture on the part of Demi and D3 that they give them to me anyway, but I am NOT entitled to them because I already got a Champion reward.