What did you think of BoFT Part 1?

Options
2»

Comments

  • Mburn7
    Mburn7 Posts: 3,427 Chairperson of the Boards
    Options
    Pretty Good! I liked it better than before
    starfall said:
    Maybe they shouldn't have put ALL the grindy levels in pt2.
    Yeah, I was hoping they would do 1-2-4 and 3-5 as the splits instead of just doing 1-2-3 and 3-4-5
  • Brakkis
    Brakkis Posts: 777 Critical Contributor
    Options
    Neutral
    As predicted, I hate part 2.

    They did nothing to alleviate the problem of 5.2 being able to get City's Blessing by turn 3. That was a luck factor that needed to be removed by changing some of the treasure spawning cards in it's deck to something else.

    4.x was the grindiest set of nodes in the game and no one liked it. They managed to make it more so, not less.

    Playing the 3rd set again is just odd.

    This entire event is an exercise in bad design.
  • WacoKid
    WacoKid Posts: 17 Just Dropped In
    Options
    Neutral
    Part 1 was okay but Part 2 is awful. Reply of 3rd set, pauper objectives on 3.1 and 4.1, and no balance between the events. Stiill a poorly designed event 
  • IM_CARLOS
    IM_CARLOS Posts: 640 Critical Contributor
    Options
    Neutral
    Maybe I should change my poll down from neutral. 

    Pt. 2 is not only for really grinding friends and at least 5 node is only for veterams with right card pool. 5.2 will be a problem. 

Categories