Guilds of Ravnica coming soon?
Comments
-
Hi Everyone. While I don't have anything to tease at the moment, we are planning on posting the Pre-Release Notes next week, so keep your eyes out for that!5
-
Do we at least know what sets will leave standard when ravnica arrives?0
-
Ixalan.ALEJANDROID said:Do we at least know what sets will leave standard when ravnica arrives?0 -
Firinmahlazer said:
Ixalan.ALEJANDROID said:Do we at least know what sets will leave standard when ravnica arrives?
That hasn't actually been confirmed. There's a possibility (or rather a hope) that nothing will. That they will leave Ixalan and that will be the new size of standard and they'll start rotating things out again after that. But as far as I know all our queries on the topic have been unanswered.0 -
Kinesia said:Firinmahlazer said:
Ixalan.ALEJANDROID said:Do we at least know what sets will leave standard when ravnica arrives?
That hasn't actually been confirmed. There's a possibility (or rather a hope) that nothing will. That they will leave Ixalan and that will be the new size of standard and they'll start rotating things out again after that. But as far as I know all our queries on the topic have been unanswered.We do not need confirmation on this. It has been stated multiple times that the Standard rotation is aone-in-one-out thing. Once a new set comes in the oldest non-Origins set in standard leaves (note MTGPQ stopped caring about blocks back in Kaladesh and treats each expansion as a new set)I don't get why this needs to be restated every single time a new set drops.2 -
It needs to be restated NOW because up until now they were getting rid of Hibernum sets.
This is the _first_ time things have been 100% Oktagon design and they get to decide the new size of standard now.
Prior to this part of the priority was getting rid of old stuff.
So it is absolutely different right now than the other times.1 -
This content has been removed.
-
Why does who designed the set matter? Oktagon has publicly and repeatedly stated that Standard consists of the 4 most recent sets and Origins. Why would that change now?Kinesia said:It needs to be restated NOW because up until now they were getting rid of Hibernum sets.
This is the _first_ time things have been 100% Oktagon design and they get to decide the new size of standard now.
Prior to this part of the priority was getting rid of old stuff.
So it is absolutely different right now than the other times.1 -
Actually it is due to the fact that the format of the blocks just recently changed from having two expansions in each block (ej, ixalan and rivals) to having just one.Mburn7 said:
Why does who designed the set matter? Oktagon has publicly and repeatedly stated that Standard consists of the 4 most recent sets and Origins. Why would that change now?Kinesia said:It needs to be restated NOW because up until now they were getting rid of Hibernum sets.
This is the _first_ time things have been 100% Oktagon design and they get to decide the new size of standard now.
Prior to this part of the priority was getting rid of old stuff.
So it is absolutely different right now than the other times.0 -
But blocks haven't existed in MTGPQ since Innistrad. Both Kaladesh, Amonkhet, and Ixalan blocks came out separately here and are treated as completely different sets by the game.ALEJANDROID said:
Actually it is due to the fact that the format of the blocks just recently changed from having two expansions in each block (ej, ixalan and rivals) to having just one.Mburn7 said:
Why does who designed the set matter? Oktagon has publicly and repeatedly stated that Standard consists of the 4 most recent sets and Origins. Why would that change now?Kinesia said:It needs to be restated NOW because up until now they were getting rid of Hibernum sets.
This is the _first_ time things have been 100% Oktagon design and they get to decide the new size of standard now.
Prior to this part of the priority was getting rid of old stuff.
So it is absolutely different right now than the other times.
I doubt this was originally done to prepare for WoTC ending the block structure, but it certainly makes the transition easy.0 -
Not exactly.... blocks are now as large or small as Wizards wants them to be. Dominaria was one set, Return to Return to Ravnica is a three set block. Blocks don't have a definitive size, which makes the one-in, one-out rotation PQ established the easiest way for players to anticipate what will be legal, as well as makes balancing standard less tricky. Fewer cards means fewer chances for interactions that are toxic or game breaking. Especially considering they don't directly translate the cards from their paper format, keeping the pool smaller makes their job easier.ALEJANDROID said:
Actually it is due to the fact that the format of the blocks just recently changed from having two expansions in each block (ej, ixalan and rivals) to having just one.Mburn7 said:
Why does who designed the set matter? Oktagon has publicly and repeatedly stated that Standard consists of the 4 most recent sets and Origins. Why would that change now?Kinesia said:It needs to be restated NOW because up until now they were getting rid of Hibernum sets.
This is the _first_ time things have been 100% Oktagon design and they get to decide the new size of standard now.
Prior to this part of the priority was getting rid of old stuff.
So it is absolutely different right now than the other times.0 -
Ixalan is actually the last true Block. They switched back to a 3-and-1 format. Ravnica will be similar theme but will not be considered a block. Mburn drove home the point I was trying to make. It's been a 1 for 1 since the switch to standard.wereotter said:
Not exactly.... blocks are now as large or small as Wizards wants them to be. Dominaria was one set, Return to Return to Ravnica is a three set block. Blocks don't have a definitive size, which makes the one-in, one-out rotation PQ established the easiest way for players to anticipate what will be legal, as well as makes balancing standard less tricky. Fewer cards means fewer chances for interactions that are toxic or game breaking. Especially considering they don't directly translate the cards from their paper format, keeping the pool smaller makes their job easier.ALEJANDROID said:
Actually it is due to the fact that the format of the blocks just recently changed from having two expansions in each block (ej, ixalan and rivals) to having just one.Mburn7 said:
Why does who designed the set matter? Oktagon has publicly and repeatedly stated that Standard consists of the 4 most recent sets and Origins. Why would that change now?Kinesia said:It needs to be restated NOW because up until now they were getting rid of Hibernum sets.
This is the _first_ time things have been 100% Oktagon design and they get to decide the new size of standard now.
Prior to this part of the priority was getting rid of old stuff.
So it is absolutely different right now than the other times.1 -
I can see why this set is taking a bit longer for them lots of interesting cards more mechanics than usual I think it will be one of the best sets we will have hopefully1
-
I just hope it is because they are taking extra time to make sure that there are no major bugs and that the cards actually work as intended.Grixis197 said:I can see why this set is taking a bit longer for them lots of interesting cards more mechanics than usual I think it will be one of the best sets we will have hopefully2 -
I spent all my crystals on the Eldrazi planeswalker, never going to use him, but I'm thinking I can probably get all those crystals back (and more) before they release a new set worth spending them on0
-
Exactly if it’s rushed won’t be good, take all the time should be amazingMburn7 said:
I just hope it is because they are taking extra time to make sure that there are no major bugs and that the cards actually work as intended.Grixis197 said:I can see why this set is taking a bit longer for them lots of interesting cards more mechanics than usual I think it will be one of the best sets we will have hopefully0 -
I bought Nissa, not Eldrazi he ain’t that good tell me does he still not have green if you use him other events?FindingHeart8 said:I spent all my crystals on the Eldrazi planeswalker, never going to use him, but I'm thinking I can probably get all those crystals back (and more) before they release a new set worth spending them on0 -
He works the same as Karn in other events (or so I'm told). Number of colors is node dependent.Grixis197 said:
I bought Nissa, not Eldrazi he ain’t that good tell me does he still not have green if you use him other events?FindingHeart8 said:I spent all my crystals on the Eldrazi planeswalker, never going to use him, but I'm thinking I can probably get all those crystals back (and more) before they release a new set worth spending them on
That being said I think his mana gains are too low to be useful anyway, especially with how expensive Eldrazi cards are.
Nissa, on the other hand, is quite fun to use. I'd get her if I wasn't waiting to get Vivien when she comes out1 -
What planeswalkers (and what color combinations for them) can we expect from the new set?
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 45.8K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.6K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.8K MPQ General Discussion
- 6.5K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2.1K MPQ Character Discussion
- 186 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.4K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 14K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 536 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.5K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 452 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 313 MtGPQ Events
- 68 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.8K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 550 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 7 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 469 Other Games
- 177 General Discussion
- 292 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements






