purplemur said: Personally as a player in transition to a higher tier. I hope we get more 2&3's at the expense of 4*s and the release cycle goes 5/4/3/4/5. NO MORE 5/3 lazy variants! New characters not redundancy!
bbigler said: Let's look at the numbers (excluding limited characters):7 x 1*s13 x 2*s = 86% increase47 x 3*s = 262% increase69 x 4*s = 47% increase27 x 5*s = 61% decreaseSo, where is this headed? Well, in general as you go up in the tiers, there's more characters to cover AND it's harder to get those covers. So, progression from tier to tier slows down exponentially, which appears to be what they want. They want you to always have some carrot to chase after. They want to control how fast players progress from tier to tier. If I can champ all 3*s in my first 20 weeks, then do they want it to take 4 times longer to champ all 4*s? It seems so. Do they want 5* champing to take 4 times longer than that?I think they're biding their time, waiting for more players to be in the 4* tier. Then they open up SCL 10 with 5* progression rewards. I think the key to knowing their end goal is in the feeder rewards. Maybe they want 3*s to feed 2 x 4*s (6 covers total) and then have 4*s feed just 1 x 5* (6 covers). Perhaps their future goal is something like this:7 x 1*s13 x 2*s = 86% increase47 x 3*s = 262% increase94 x 4*s = 100% increase94 x 5*s = 0% changeSo, that would be 25 more 4*s and 67 more 5*s, which would take 3.5 years. Perhaps by then they'll focus on new PVE events and villains! To answer the OP's question, I think we're done with 3*s.
Jaedenkaal said: No one wants 30 1*s. They'd have to just give the covers away without tokens just so you could cover some of them, and as soon as you hit 2* land you're just selling all your 1* covers anyways,
broll said: Jaedenkaal said: No one wants 30 1*s. They'd have to just give the covers away without tokens just so you could cover some of them, and as soon as you hit 2* land you're just selling all your 1* covers anyways, Are you saying people want 70+ 4*s? Heck, are you saying people want the 7 1*s we have now? The way the game is setup it has to release new characters to keep going. It's one of the negatives of the model they've chosen. I'm just suggesting they spread it out before the floor breaks out of the 4* tier worse than it already is.Also if they were to go that route, which isn't likely so this all just a fun hypothetical, but I'd say they would/should make 1*s champable so people bother doing stuff with them. Alternatively when 6*s come out upgrade the 7 1*s to 2*s and go for a 1 to 1 ratio on 2* to 3* feeders. Dormammu said: broll said: I sure hope so.I also hope we're gonna be done with 4*s soon.#SixStarsOverdue Broll you're so naughty. Were you testing the flag waters? I have to agree with you on 4-stars. I think most people would. I mean, how big does this tier need to be? Not that more 3-stars are needed - I think that tier is about the size it needs to be, maybe even a little heavy. I'd rather see more 2-stars added, even though that'd be rather pointless too.
broll said: Jaedenkaal said: No one wants 30 1*s. They'd have to just give the covers away without tokens just so you could cover some of them, and as soon as you hit 2* land you're just selling all your 1* covers anyways, Are you saying people want 70+ 4*s? Heck, are you saying people want the 7 1*s we have now? The way the game is setup it has to release new characters to keep going. It's one of the negatives of the model they've chosen. I'm just suggesting they spread it out before the floor breaks out of the 4* tier worse than it already is.Also if they were to go that route, which isn't likely so this all just a fun hypothetical, but I'd say they would/should make 1*s champable so people bother doing stuff with them. Alternatively when 6*s come out upgrade the 7 1*s to 2*s and go for a 1 to 1 ratio on 2* to 3* feeders.
broll said: I sure hope so.I also hope we're gonna be done with 4*s soon.#SixStarsOverdue
Daredevil217 said: broll said: Jaedenkaal said: No one wants 30 1*s. They'd have to just give the covers away without tokens just so you could cover some of them, and as soon as you hit 2* land you're just selling all your 1* covers anyways, Are you saying people want 70+ 4*s? Heck, are you saying people want the 7 1*s we have now? The way the game is setup it has to release new characters to keep going. It's one of the negatives of the model they've chosen. I'm just suggesting they spread it out before the floor breaks out of the 4* tier worse than it already is.Also if they were to go that route, which isn't likely so this all just a fun hypothetical, but I'd say they would/should make 1*s champable so people bother doing stuff with them. Alternatively when 6*s come out upgrade the 7 1*s to 2*s and go for a 1 to 1 ratio on 2* to 3* feeders. Dormammu said: broll said: I sure hope so.I also hope we're gonna be done with 4*s soon.#SixStarsOverdue Broll you're so naughty. Were you testing the flag waters? I have to agree with you on 4-stars. I think most people would. I mean, how big does this tier need to be? Not that more 3-stars are needed - I think that tier is about the size it needs to be, maybe even a little heavy. I'd rather see more 2-stars added, even though that'd be rather pointless too. As a 4* player with all but Emma champed I like my 70 4*s. I would like it if they increased the 4* boosted list by 1 each week. Other than that, I’ll happily accept any new toys that are released as long as they are good. We’ve had some serious clunkers lately though.
broll said: Daredevil217 said: broll said: Jaedenkaal said: No one wants 30 1*s. They'd have to just give the covers away without tokens just so you could cover some of them, and as soon as you hit 2* land you're just selling all your 1* covers anyways, Are you saying people want 70+ 4*s? Heck, are you saying people want the 7 1*s we have now? The way the game is setup it has to release new characters to keep going. It's one of the negatives of the model they've chosen. I'm just suggesting they spread it out before the floor breaks out of the 4* tier worse than it already is.Also if they were to go that route, which isn't likely so this all just a fun hypothetical, but I'd say they would/should make 1*s champable so people bother doing stuff with them. Alternatively when 6*s come out upgrade the 7 1*s to 2*s and go for a 1 to 1 ratio on 2* to 3* feeders. Dormammu said: broll said: I sure hope so.I also hope we're gonna be done with 4*s soon.#SixStarsOverdue Broll you're so naughty. Were you testing the flag waters? I have to agree with you on 4-stars. I think most people would. I mean, how big does this tier need to be? Not that more 3-stars are needed - I think that tier is about the size it needs to be, maybe even a little heavy. I'd rather see more 2-stars added, even though that'd be rather pointless too. As a 4* player with all but Emma champed I like my 70 4*s. I would like it if they increased the 4* boosted list by 1 each week. Other than that, I’ll happily accept any new toys that are released as long as they are good. We’ve had some serious clunkers lately though. By 1 each week? So in a year it would be like 56 out of 88? That sounds like too much lol.
Daredevil217 said: broll said: Daredevil217 said: broll said: Jaedenkaal said: No one wants 30 1*s. They'd have to just give the covers away without tokens just so you could cover some of them, and as soon as you hit 2* land you're just selling all your 1* covers anyways, Are you saying people want 70+ 4*s? Heck, are you saying people want the 7 1*s we have now? The way the game is setup it has to release new characters to keep going. It's one of the negatives of the model they've chosen. I'm just suggesting they spread it out before the floor breaks out of the 4* tier worse than it already is.Also if they were to go that route, which isn't likely so this all just a fun hypothetical, but I'd say they would/should make 1*s champable so people bother doing stuff with them. Alternatively when 6*s come out upgrade the 7 1*s to 2*s and go for a 1 to 1 ratio on 2* to 3* feeders. Dormammu said: broll said: I sure hope so.I also hope we're gonna be done with 4*s soon.#SixStarsOverdue Broll you're so naughty. Were you testing the flag waters? I have to agree with you on 4-stars. I think most people would. I mean, how big does this tier need to be? Not that more 3-stars are needed - I think that tier is about the size it needs to be, maybe even a little heavy. I'd rather see more 2-stars added, even though that'd be rather pointless too. As a 4* player with all but Emma champed I like my 70 4*s. I would like it if they increased the 4* boosted list by 1 each week. Other than that, I’ll happily accept any new toys that are released as long as they are good. We’ve had some serious clunkers lately though. By 1 each week? So in a year it would be like 56 out of 88? That sounds like too much lol. Sorry if that was confusing. I’m saying the weekly boost list should be increased by one. Meaning instead of like 5 (or how ever many it is) boosted characters we have each week, we instead get six (or how we many it is plus 1).