Firinmahlazer said: dispersing wealthAre you some kind of communist?
jimpark said: Firinmahlazer said: dispersing wealthAre you some kind of communist? LOL. not that I am aware of? I just feel there is a huge disparity between the top end and the bottom end of the leaderboards and these may help newer players and stagnating coalitions, who we want to retain, to have something to look forward to competitively. Also, I remember when I was first starting out in this game about a little over a year ago and how bleak things felt with the leaderboards and the rewards, granted the rewards have improved significantly since then (in some ways).
Firinmahlazer said: jimpark said: Firinmahlazer said: dispersing wealthAre you some kind of communist? LOL. not that I am aware of? I just feel there is a huge disparity between the top end and the bottom end of the leaderboards and these may help newer players and stagnating coalitions, who we want to retain, to have something to look forward to competitively. Also, I remember when I was first starting out in this game about a little over a year ago and how bleak things felt with the leaderboards and the rewards, granted the rewards have improved significantly since then (in some ways). Sorry I may have been off my rocker a bit last night . I guess at the end of the day I don't really see the harm in bumping up rewards a tad on the low and for bronze/silver players. It would have to be balanced in a way that platinum still offered the incentive of higher rewards therefore making sure people still want to progress to the next level.