The RIX Dragon Spirits Need a Buff
Comments
-
they do look pretty dragon-like, even more if you haven't had your coffee yetTilwin90 said:
Ah darn, these are DINOSAURS. Makes sense. *facepalm*FindingHeart8 said:
no worries man, except I think you might be referring to a dinosaur. I double checked and all dragons in mtgpq have flying, but there are red mythic dinosaurs that do not. Is that what you mean?Tilwin90 said:Oh sorry... I got confused with the red mythic dragon that does not have flying... Which indeed is accurate. Sorry for the mix up
The way Etali and Nezahal look I always imagined they are dragons. Zetalpa is just as confusing but at least she has flying.

1 -
GrizzoMtGPQ said:These dragons are pathetic. They are not even close to masterpiece level creatures. I would propose the following changes:
- Reduced the cost to 10 or 12
- Remove the gem condition on the special effects
- Add a property that if it dies it immediately comes back to your hand (like Scarab God)
If you removed the gem requirement the cost that they are now would be about right IMHO. Reducing the cost is just encouraging more power creep. But I do like the return to hand bit, but if that is the case, that should raise the cost by 1 or 2. I'm sorry but we as a player have a lot of ways to abuse their death effects and being able to swing that effect back and forth via cast. That returning-to-the-hand upon death ability for a creature whose global effects kick in upon death is a powerful thing
0 -
do you even jurrasic park, bro ?Tilwin90 said:
Ah darn, these are DINOSAURS. Makes sense. *facepalm*FindingHeart8 said:
no worries man, except I think you might be referring to a dinosaur. I double checked and all dragons in mtgpq have flying, but there are red mythic dinosaurs that do not. Is that what you mean?Tilwin90 said:Oh sorry... I got confused with the red mythic dragon that does not have flying... Which indeed is accurate. Sorry for the mix up
The way Etali and Nezahal look I always imagined they are dragons. Zetalpa is just as confusing but at least she has flying.
2 -
Just scrap the dragons that need to die to be worthwhile and give us the Praetorian's instead...
Honestly though, the gem conditions need to reduced for these things.0 -
You won't like Kokusho in L3 if there is no gem requirement. Cya later 10 life and first 3 cards.2
-
That would just put it on par with Platinum Angel masterpiece, which I have seen abused beautifully with Lily3ZW2007- said:You won't like Kokusho in L3 if there is no gem requirement. Cya later 10 life and first 3 cards.
0 -
Perhaps the gem requirements need adjusting for some of them, but yeah, outright removing them is too heavy handing and has potential for badness.ZW2007- said:You won't like Kokusho in L3 if there is no gem requirement. Cya later 10 life and first 3 cards.
The Blue one for example... Steal your worst creature and give it Hexproof _without_ any restrictions or hoops to jump through? Hexproof is a big deal and traditionally hard to put on most creatures.0 -
I support this buff.1
-
You have to jump through at least a couple hoops to get it, though, becuase you need to be a blue deck that wants to kill its creatures, and have space on the board to take opponent's creature. Keiga is really no better than Lay Claim or Kefnet's Last, and that's without the gem restriction. I would say Keiga is the least powerful of the masterpiece dinosaurs dragons, and would benefit most from some kind of buff. Agreed hexproof gives maybe a little trepidation, so how about gem-count goes away, and hexproof is replaced with flying?Kinesia said:
Perhaps the gem requirements need adjusting for some of them, but yeah, outright removing them is too heavy handing and has potential for badness.ZW2007- said:You won't like Kokusho in L3 if there is no gem requirement. Cya later 10 life and first 3 cards.
The Blue one for example... Steal your worst creature and give it Hexproof _without_ any restrictions or hoops to jump through? Hexproof is a big deal and traditionally hard to put on most creatures.0 -
Sweet! Now if only Brigby would come to visit and support this buff too, and pass it on to the developers and they support this buff, and then the dragons get buffed and we all are happybken1234 said:I support this buff.
0 -
If Keiga dies, you should have a slot for the stolen creature without much effort.DumasAG said:
You have to jump through at least a couple hoops to get it, though, becuase you need to be a blue deck that wants to kill its creatures, and have space on the board to take opponent's creature. Keiga is really no better than Lay Claim or Kefnet's Last, and that's without the gem restriction. I would say Keiga is the least powerful of the masterpiece dinosaurs dragons, and would benefit most from some kind of buff. Agreed hexproof gives maybe a little trepidation, so how about gem-count goes away, and hexproof is replaced with flying?Kinesia said:
Perhaps the gem requirements need adjusting for some of them, but yeah, outright removing them is too heavy handing and has potential for badness.ZW2007- said:You won't like Kokusho in L3 if there is no gem requirement. Cya later 10 life and first 3 cards.
The Blue one for example... Steal your worst creature and give it Hexproof _without_ any restrictions or hoops to jump through? Hexproof is a big deal and traditionally hard to put on most creatures.
Besides if you play one of those dragons you probably already have in mind a deck where they are likely to die in a way or another.
My overall feeling is most of them are already powerful if you use them with cards or walkers that can trade their sacrifice for another efect.
They really start to shine when you have a way to send them back from graveyard to the field ... there are a few already (they aren't too easy to get though).
The idea of getting rid of the gem condition is seducing but im pretty sure it could make some of them too powerful with the proper sinergies.
However, I do not like the return to hand idea, because they would no longer be able to get back from cementary to the field while it is actually the most interesting way to play them.0 -

Hey Guys! Check out all my pretty paperweights!!!!
1 -
Very lucky. How many elite packs did you open.... five?FindingHeart8 said:
Hey Guys! Check out all my pretty paperweights!!!!0 -
khurram said:
Very lucky. How many elite packs did you open.... five?FindingHeart8 said:
Hey Guys! Check out all my pretty paperweights!!!!
Just one but it cascaded.2 -
Lucky Indeed. 3 for 3, a new Kamigawa dragon per pack. Ironically it's also my favorite set since it was released back in the day.khurram said:
Very lucky. How many elite packs did you open.... five?FindingHeart8 said:
Hey Guys! Check out all my pretty paperweights!!!!
0 -
lol, those mana requirements though! #GreedDotDeck #RespectFindingHeart8 said:
Hey Guys! Check out all my pretty paperweights!!!!0 -
if memory serves, I'm pretty sure the 3-shield support I had on the field there was Bounty of LuxaDumasAG said:
lol, those mana requirements though! #GreedDotDeck #RespectFindingHeart8 said:
Hey Guys! Check out all my pretty paperweights!!!!
0 -
I just got one (white) and while I'm excited to have it for nostalgia purposes, I can't say I have a home for it, or am eager to put it in a deck. Just not good enough.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 45.8K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.6K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.8K MPQ General Discussion
- 6.5K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2.1K MPQ Character Discussion
- 186 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.4K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 14.1K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 539 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.6K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 454 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 316 MtGPQ Events
- 68 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.8K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 550 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 7 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 471 Other Games
- 179 General Discussion
- 292 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements







