JHawkInc said: ZeroKarma said: JHawkInc said: The rockett said: LOL. So let me get this straight. 4* SL doesn’t feed 5* SL. Man this make no sense at all. Do you just pull names out of a hat for this? Acting like decisions you don't like must have been randomly pulled out of a hat is obnoxious. I think he’s pointing out the fact that Starlord does not reward Starlord. If I were to devise a logical feeder for 5* Starlord it would be....4* Starlord. Or it might be Gamora, his love interest. Or Yondu his father figure. Drax has a connection to Starlord, but less than the others. He should feed 5* Mantis or Ronin. Something like that. Contrary to the popular belief of these forums, you can express an opinion without being toxic about it. Case in point, many others in this thread have done just that. I get the overall sentiment, but it can be expressed in a constructive manner, and being hateful and mocking isn't necessary to get your point across.Besides, it's silly to get up in arms about. The update says "Drax will give 5* Star Lord covers" not "Drax will give 5* Star Lord covers and 4* Star Lord will never ever ever ever ever get to do that." 4*s greatly outnumber 5*s, it would be plenty easy for them to have more than one 4* that feeds any given 5*, and it makes sense to rotate those out over time. There is no 5* Mantis or Ronin, and making Drax more useful by letting him grant Star Lord covers isn't a bad thing. Further, there's absolutely nothing stopping them from having Drax feed Captain America, and making Spider-Woman feed Star Lord instead (and I bet we'll have weird matchups like that before all is said and done, it won't all line up 100% perfect), so getting bent out of shape when the devs try to make a thematic link and don't do the one you want is silly.So when the devs say "We're changing things so that you get FREE 5* COVERS!" and people go "UGH, not 4* Star Lord? Do you even know what you're doing?" the ungrateful childish whining irks me a little bit.
ZeroKarma said: JHawkInc said: The rockett said: LOL. So let me get this straight. 4* SL doesn’t feed 5* SL. Man this make no sense at all. Do you just pull names out of a hat for this? Acting like decisions you don't like must have been randomly pulled out of a hat is obnoxious. I think he’s pointing out the fact that Starlord does not reward Starlord. If I were to devise a logical feeder for 5* Starlord it would be....4* Starlord. Or it might be Gamora, his love interest. Or Yondu his father figure. Drax has a connection to Starlord, but less than the others. He should feed 5* Mantis or Ronin. Something like that.
JHawkInc said: The rockett said: LOL. So let me get this straight. 4* SL doesn’t feed 5* SL. Man this make no sense at all. Do you just pull names out of a hat for this? Acting like decisions you don't like must have been randomly pulled out of a hat is obnoxious.
The rockett said: LOL. So let me get this straight. 4* SL doesn’t feed 5* SL. Man this make no sense at all. Do you just pull names out of a hat for this?
nycjonny said: R4G or Yondu might have been better choices. I don't see a lot of champed Drax out there.
Well, bummer. 5* Star-Lord is one of the few I don't have rostered, so I guess that's Another roster spot I need to cough up. My Drax is level 291 so I will only get one cover too.
At least I will have Star-Lord rostered next time he is essential in PvE... which hopefully is a ways off since he is the only Classic fivestar to have been essential twice already.
I really expected Gambit to get a feeder this time, but I guess I put too much faith in the old pattern.
Vhailorx said: Definitely starting to consider the conspiracy theory that they are putting 5* prizes on those 4*s that get less attention (I.e. are champed on fewer rosters). Sandy, elektra, drax, kp, etc. Is Eddie Brock venom next? Or mr. Fantastic? I suppose it's a nice reward for those vets that invested in the trash tier. But it kinds sucks for those players who are not post-iso. Now they have to choose between 5* champ covers and a useful 4* roster).
Daredevil217 said: Vhailorx said: Definitely starting to consider the conspiracy theory that they are putting 5* prizes on those 4*s that get less attention (I.e. are champed on fewer rosters). Sandy, elektra, drax, kp, etc. Is Eddie Brock venom next? Or mr. Fantastic? I suppose it's a nice reward for those vets that invested in the trash tier. But it kinds sucks for those players who are not post-iso. Now they have to choose between 5* champ covers and a useful 4* roster). The etc. you’re leaving out are vulture, gamora (two characters that are both recent and good) and Kate (also great). And you added Elektra to your list to help make your point, when she in fact feeds no one. Kind of odd. Fact is, some are good characters some are bad. People clamor for new feeders then promptly complain when they get them. Attaching a feeder to a bad character also may be their way of bolstering the excitement of pulling said character without giving them a proper rebalance. The value of a Drax- the weakest guardian in the tier- just increased for many players. Anyway, while I don’t particularly care about the 5 tier, thanks D3 for the new feeder!
Vhailorx said: Definitely starting to consider the conspiracy theory that they are putting 5* prizes on those 4*s that get less attention (I.e. are champed on fewer rosters). Sandy, [snip], drax, kp, etc. Is Eddie Brock venom next?
sinnerjfl said: nycjonny said: R4G or Yondu might have been better choices. I don't see a lot of champed Drax out there. That seems to be by design when you consider who they've picked as feeders recently: Sandman, Kingpin and now Drax... not very popular characters.