EDUSAN wrote: my lvl 50 liliana's matches take forever, and my lvl 20 chandra's matches take 7 minutes. I think ill keep playing her
pandabear wrote: Gideon at 50 will lose to gideon at 33 hands down. It blowwwwwwwwws. I'd also much rather have it dependent on the level of the enemy than on my level. Level 8 gideon could wipe the floor with most level 50 people. And I prefer it to level 33, even with lowered mana and hp. You should be able to select the level of your opponent (in 10 level increments) for higher rewards.
fruithead wrote: i want this to matter more, but until they improve the ai you could leave your PW at lvl 1 and win consistently. for time spent however, nissa at 50 for 6 ribbons really does seem like a great time/ribbon payoff
raidan wrote: EDUSAN wrote: my lvl 50 liliana's matches take forever, and my lvl 20 chandra's matches take 7 minutes. I think ill keep playing her I would recommend leveling her from 20 to 30. You will gain 2 additional mana bonuses, access to her 3rd spell (maybe useful for a final burn) and 50% more ribbons.
cheveedodd wrote: raidan wrote: EDUSAN wrote: my lvl 50 liliana's matches take forever, and my lvl 20 chandra's matches take 7 minutes. I think ill keep playing her I would recommend leveling her from 20 to 30. You will gain 2 additional mana bonuses, access to her 3rd spell (maybe useful for a final burn) and 50% more ribbons. At the cost of longer games. If I can't play a game during a work brake, or between my kids needing something, I am far less likely to play.
SJwaxKing wrote: I'm not exactly happy with the past 2 updates which have effectively ruined my chosen plains walker and deck/strategy.
pandabear wrote: I fail to see how allowing you to choose your opponent level favors lower level players. Unless, gasp, being higher level isn't all that great and they have to artificially incentivize you to level
raidan wrote: pandabear wrote: I fail to see how allowing you to choose your opponent level favors lower level players. Unless, gasp, being higher level isn't all that great and they have to artificially incentivize you to level That is exactly why. The only thing they would need to do to fix that it allow you to select the rank of each ability before you start each match. (It could default each time to whatever you set it to last). Then there would be no negative side to leveling up to 50, except for grinding runes.
nexus13 wrote: Maybe time to rethink those strategies. My level 2 Gideon just got paired with a level 50 Nissa.
raidan wrote: nexus13 wrote: Maybe time to rethink those strategies. My level 2 Gideon just got paired with a level 50 Nissa. I also heard someone at lv 50 go paired with a level 1. Sounds like it may be a bug that effects max level players and players level 5 and below.