Is there any reason to care about finishing 21-50 in CL10 pve?

Vhailorx

Am i missing something, or is  finishing #99 almost exactly as good as finishing #21?  I wonder how this will affect people's grinding habits in cl 10. 

Lord_Xberk

Was just talking about this in my alliance.  The answer seems to be no.

I feel like there was a reward break point at t50 in old CL9 (which resulted in a 4* cover), but maybe I'm mistaken.  This t100 break point now gives you the option to play optimally for t20 or just go for progression or 6/6 (which will likely get t100).  Seems to be less pressure honestly.

But, my continued complaint about PVE is that the game has separated the playerbase into those who can play at specific times and those who can't.  If you want the best PVE rewards, you better be able to play when the game says so.  

wymtime

Not much different between the two.  That is probably good to encourage more players than I play a higher CL.  If 51-100 in CL10 was significantly worse more players might drop down a CL to get better placement rewards 

KenshinUK

I'm aiming for progression and top300 which seems doable with my roster depending on the event and boost list.

Managed one clear of the challenge node in the 48hour sub too.

Mayo

Seems there are people that will never be pleased. Playing scl10 for 99% of players takes much more time and health packs. If you want to play for speed as always better go to scl9. 

Taganov

You aren't taking into account Alliance scores (score requirements for competitive alliances) and awards, and higher rank placement rewards in each sub (+3CP +95HP/sub). I can't/won't grind that hard, but there are reasons many players do.