The rise and fall of Q&A

Laeuftbeidir

It was a nice idea by Oktagon to give us the monthly Q and A. It started okay, pivoting between great and worthless, but now it seems to be forgotten. Where is it, @brigby? Well get another super Q and A? If the devs don't have time, why not tell us what's taking up their time?

Unknown

This content has been removed.

Boogeyman

The following is pure speculation:

Here is my guess, the devs are split between all the different and new games in development.  They probably get 1 week a month to work on MTGPQ, and I am being generous.  If they could only spend enough time to make it fun, profitable, and bug free.  

Unknown

This content has been removed.

Brigby

Laeuftbeidir said:

It was a nice idea by Oktagon to give us the monthly Q and A. It started okay, pivoting between great and worthless, but now it seems to be forgotten. Where is it, brigby? Well get another super Q and A? If the devs don't have time, why not tell us what's taking up their time?

When it comes to this recent Q&A, which we'll likely wrap into the April one, it's my fault because I've been out of office for about 2 weeks during the end of March. Normally that's the time when I would be submitting it to them, they'd be answering it, we'd finalize formatting, and then post it at the end of March.

Unfortunately because of my time being out for jury duty, everything has been pushed back, so I'm hoping by doing a short Q&A this month and expediting it to get wrapped into a March/April Q&A post, I can get the Q&A back on a consistent schedule.

Laeuftbeidir

There's always a reason. Just like there are always good resolutions. They just happen to interfer more often than not.I don't believe in such statements when I think about how  this game has a history of rather waiting out anything than just talk to us. It'd be nice to be proven wrong.