span_argoman said: @Laeuftbeidir Does your tally for the HOU events include or exclude the prolonged 7-month period where HOU was the latest set? Cause if it does, then that would introduce bias into the tally.
Laeuftbeidir said: span_argoman said: @Laeuftbeidir Does your tally for the HOU events include or exclude the prolonged 7-month period where HOU was the latest set? Cause if it does, then that would introduce bias into the tally. Sure it's biased! But in this context, I don't think it makes a difference: no fancy analysis, just a "I really don't want to play these events anymore, here's why". For this, the overall numbers are enough. I actually stopped from spending any other dime into this game when I realized there's not even a new event upcoming, and will continue to do so until that at least has changed.
span_argoman said: Laeuftbeidir said: span_argoman said: @Laeuftbeidir Does your tally for the HOU events include or exclude the prolonged 7-month period where HOU was the latest set? Cause if it does, then that would introduce bias into the tally. Sure it's biased! But in this context, I don't think it makes a difference: no fancy analysis, just a "I really don't want to play these events anymore, here's why". For this, the overall numbers are enough. I actually stopped from spending any other dime into this game when I realized there's not even a new event upcoming, and will continue to do so until that at least has changed. Ah ok. So would it be fair to say then that the change in secondary objectives for RotGP did not do anything to make the event more replayable to you?
Machine said: span_argoman said: Laeuftbeidir said: Sure it's biased! But in this context, I don't think it makes a difference: no fancy analysis, just a "I really don't want to play these events anymore, here's why". For this, the overall numbers are enough. I actually stopped from spending any other dime into this game when I realized there's not even a new event upcoming, and will continue to do so until that at least has changed. Ah ok. So would it be fair to say then that the change in secondary objectives for RotGP did not do anything to make the event more replayable to you? It has been for me, even more that it is a Legacy event now.
span_argoman said: Laeuftbeidir said: Sure it's biased! But in this context, I don't think it makes a difference: no fancy analysis, just a "I really don't want to play these events anymore, here's why". For this, the overall numbers are enough. I actually stopped from spending any other dime into this game when I realized there's not even a new event upcoming, and will continue to do so until that at least has changed. Ah ok. So would it be fair to say then that the change in secondary objectives for RotGP did not do anything to make the event more replayable to you?
Laeuftbeidir said: Sure it's biased! But in this context, I don't think it makes a difference: no fancy analysis, just a "I really don't want to play these events anymore, here's why". For this, the overall numbers are enough. I actually stopped from spending any other dime into this game when I realized there's not even a new event upcoming, and will continue to do so until that at least has changed.
starfall said: Laeuftbeidir said:every pve encounter is a puzzle. The more often I solved it, the easier it gets. If you keep the same picture, and change the tiles, it doesn't become a different puzzle. Shifting RotGP into Legacy made the puzzle even easier, as we had more, and more powerful, pieces to work with.
Laeuftbeidir said:every pve encounter is a puzzle. The more often I solved it, the easier it gets. If you keep the same picture, and change the tiles, it doesn't become a different puzzle.
Gunmix25 said: I happen to like RotGP, thank you very much