Froggy said: Agreed.Oh wait!! I’ve seen similar posts about this before...Agh! Another dejavu...Is be happy just to see this continuous argument end.
MADAFAKA said: Option to play legacy or standard in TG doesn't hurt.Legacy is the perfect way to test your standard deck IMO. If your standard deck wins within a legacy environment, its a good deck. People playing OP cards is just to get their 4 wins as fast as possible.
wereotter said: MADAFAKA said: Option to play legacy or standard in TG doesn't hurt.Legacy is the perfect way to test your standard deck IMO. If your standard deck wins within a legacy environment, its a good deck. People playing OP cards is just to get their 4 wins as fast as possible. I would disagree. For example, in legacy you have to be prepared for the plethora of cheap removal spells in almost every color meaning you have to adjust your creature strategy accordingly to either lots of ramp, hexproof, or lots of cheap creatures whereas for standard you have to be prepared for support based disable more so than kills spells. Means what works for legacy doesn't always work for standard.Similarly people are more likely running different strategies in standard. In events I see a lot more attempts to tribal synergy since Ixalan cards require it, but in legacy it's more just anything goes, whatever is biggest.
ILikePancakes said: Froggy said: Agreed.Oh wait!! I’ve seen similar posts about this before...Agh! Another dejavu...Is be happy just to see this continuous argument end. Most everything here is a rehash. Perhaps if you have nothing constructive to add to a thread, another option is to decline to comment. Have a pleasant day.
Froggy said: ILikePancakes said: Froggy said: Agreed.Oh wait!! I’ve seen similar posts about this before...Agh! Another dejavu...Is be happy just to see this continuous argument end. Most everything here is a rehash. Perhaps if you have nothing constructive to add to a thread, another option is to decline to comment. Have a pleasant day. Was just forwarding your cause. I’ve had my own chats on this and so more commentary might help bring about awareness. I find that more useful than idly observing a problem and doing nothing at all about it (and The problem is real).And have a nice day to you too. One that hopefully sees a TG in both formats.
Gilesclone said: I think they know that if they make either 2 training grounds (1 std) or one with a choice, we’ll all be happy for 5 minutes then start complaining about something else
Mainloop25 said: Gilesclone said: I think they know that if they make either 2 training grounds (1 std) or one with a choice, we’ll all be happy for 5 minutes then start complaining about something else So then they will have to fix the next problem. Doesn't make this complaint invalid.
Mainloop25 said: I don't agree with all of the proposed suggestions ,even from fellow coalition mates. That's why polls are important. This one I do believe would improve the game if it was implemented and is in-line with the original idea for Training Grounds.Besides, they already ignore plenty of our suggestions. I think they are used to it
Gilesclone said: We just have to keep bringing this up (and the 12 hours after the last charge idea) until they listen.