Admiral Beckett Brass

13»

Comments

  • GrizzoMtGPQ
    GrizzoMtGPQ Posts: 776 Critical Contributor
    Really surprised this hasn't been said yet but Lay Claim costs more because it is an Uncommon. We've been told that Hibernum designed Commons and Uncommons to have a rarity tax. The other cards that do similar things are Rare or Mythic.

    I expect that the creature destruction behavior is a bug. It actually had a different behavior when it first came out. I got it on day one and it let you take a creature if you had 3 but it did not destroy it if you failed to replace one of your own, it just left the AI with the creature as if you never cast it.
  • andrewvanmarle
    andrewvanmarle Posts: 978 Critical Contributor
    Really surprised this hasn't been said yet but Lay Claim costs more because it is an Uncommon. We've been told that Hibernum designed Commons and Uncommons to have a rarity tax. The other cards that do similar things are Rare or Mythic.

    I expect that the creature destruction behavior is a bug. It actually had a different behavior when it first came out. I got it on day one and it let you take a creature if you had 3 but it did not destroy it if you failed to replace one of your own, it just left the AI with the creature as if you never cast it.
    That rule is a bit loose and fast Grizzo:

    exert influence is a mythic for 10 mana with condition to board state
    confiscation coup: rare 15 mana with conditions on energy and board state
    kefnets last word: rare  11 mana   with self mana drain and condition to board state
    welcome to the fold: rare 11 mana condition on board state and creature power

    Lay claim: uncommon 21 mana no conditions and cycling


    now it's'hard to convert the conditions into mana, but the costs seem in the same range, offset by an extra condition here and there. Lay claim is double the cost, rarity tax was never that high was it? I'd'say most of that cost goes into the fact that it has cycling and no conditions.