Trial of Strength Objectives
babar3355
Posts: 1,128 Chairperson of the Boards
Can anyone confirm if the objectives are correct for the embalm node in ToS?
Last running it said lose 2 or more creatures but meant lose 2 or less.
0
Comments
-
Hi @babar3355 I personally checked the Sacrifice objective, and that seemed to work correctly when 3 of my creatures died that game.
When it comes to the rest of the objectives, I've reached out to the developers, and am awaiting their response.
Update: The developers have confirmed that the bug was fixed.1 -
Thanks Brigby!0
-
This would have been a great use of the in-game Inbox.
6 -
Just for clarity, I have not tried sacrificing creatures to see whether this counts towards the objective. I have heard reports that it currently does not.
I have reached out to the developers to find out if sacrificing creatures is intended to count towards the objective or not. I will inform the community of their response when I hear back from them.0 -
Actually it's better glued than embalming + protector objectives. Embalm is really nice mechanics but you need to be able to use it. And this is done when you are allowed to kill your creatures.0
-
Speaking of objectives, geez people are doing well in this event. So far it seems a single loss not only puts you out of 1-5, it puts you out of 1-50!1
-
Just be careful. I sacrificed my 3rd with the manticore but dealt lethal damage from it, so I didn't get credit for the objective. Not entirely sure why, but still, be warned
0 -
Because the lethal damage was done before the end of your turn, which is when your creatures are sacrificed.1
-
I would describe it more as the lethal damage was
done before the sacrifice was registered. similar
to how lifelink lethal damage doesn't actually gain
you any hp.
HH0 -
Yes but whether it's a bug or not, it will almost always reward you the life gain after the match ends, in the reward screen.0
-
that hp top up is from lifegain when you had max
hp, that's a different bug.
HH0 -
madwren said:This would have been a great use of the in-game Inbox.
The only reason I can think of is that they made the inbox much "prettier" than the others and need to format things instead of just typing out a quick message and I do not approve of sacrificing function for the sake of form. I think it's dumb.1
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.8K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.2K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.6K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 503 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 421 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 298 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.6K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements