Tournaments based off roster strength
I think it would eliminate a lot of issues if tournaments were held by teams with players under a certain cap. ex. no player over level 70 or no players over level 50. the prizes can be lesser covers but it shouldn't be open to all players and have players with level 100 characters winning them all.
0
Comments
-
Actually, if you do not have 2* characters that are maxed out, you are probably far better off getting a 2* cover than a 3* cover. Those 3* covers use precious space, and, with very, very few exceptions, a maxed out 2* is better than a 3* with 9 covers. Until you can get 3* covers consistently, and you can get 400 HP a week consistently, winning a single tournament here and there would not be all that valuable.
What has been lost is being able to get 3 2* covers for working hard in a single PvP tournament.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.8K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.3K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.6K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 508 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 424 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 299 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.7K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements