How is Overload Supposed to trigger?
JanksMcJank
Posts: 62 Match Maker
I have these three cards in play:
Thanks to EV, I have a bunch of Energized Gems.
I notice a nice 6 match (4x3) that'll also clear out a whole column (the 4 match portion).
I counted the energized gems. 6. 3 in the match, 3 more in the column being destroyed that are not part of my match itself.
This is the whole promise I saw of these cards: having a few creatures & supports in play and a single match will trigger multiple of them... ideally more than once
Servent of the Conduit should trigger 6x for 18 mana, so I moved a heavy spell up next.
Tiger should trigger 6x giving him +12/+12 for the round.
So I make my match and the Tiger gets +2. I get 3 mana. ::sad trombone music:: It looks like they were only triggered once.
If destruction gems (on a 4+ match) don't count toward the costs, that means these two cards alone are pretty sad and any "energize 2, cost 2:" cares are useless, because random gems are energized, meaning you energize two gems that are nearly impossible to match (different colors or far apart).
Thanks to EV, I have a bunch of Energized Gems.
I notice a nice 6 match (4x3) that'll also clear out a whole column (the 4 match portion).
I counted the energized gems. 6. 3 in the match, 3 more in the column being destroyed that are not part of my match itself.
This is the whole promise I saw of these cards: having a few creatures & supports in play and a single match will trigger multiple of them... ideally more than once
Servent of the Conduit should trigger 6x for 18 mana, so I moved a heavy spell up next.
Tiger should trigger 6x giving him +12/+12 for the round.
So I make my match and the Tiger gets +2. I get 3 mana. ::sad trombone music:: It looks like they were only triggered once.
- Are excess gems destroyed by a match 4+ (and not within the match) supposed to count? They were destroyed.
- Are only gems within the match supposed to count?
- If you match 3 green energized gems, should the "1:" cost be met 3x and trigger 3x?
- If you have two creatures in play with a "1:" cost and match 1 single energized gem, should both be fed & activate?
If destruction gems (on a 4+ match) don't count toward the costs, that means these two cards alone are pretty sad and any "energize 2, cost 2:" cares are useless, because random gems are energized, meaning you energize two gems that are nearly impossible to match (different colors or far apart).
0
Comments
-
You can trigger Overload once per match. So it can trigger multiple times on cascades, but it doesn't matter how many Energized gems over the Overload cost you destroy with one match. If you want to use Overload to its full potential, Energize the board and try to trigger multiple matches each turn.0
-
energise is different to activate. any landslide break is
considered a match but only for that gem movement
match. a match 5 will only ever trigger one occurrence
of the overload, any resulting cascades can potentially
trigger more overloads. landslides are useful for
triggering overload 3 which would be much more
difficult if you were to wait for 3 energise gems to line
up.
HH0 -
I now realize "2:" activation are almost impossible unless you have a deck built around energizing gems.0
-
Yeah, you need to build your deck around the mechanic to make it work well.0
-
Oh...
Damn0 -
This is why energize is an all or nothing type investment, which makes Kaladesh very weak. There's no way you can survive fully optimized decks without using some of the key utility cards from prior sets, and there's no way you can fit all of those utility cards and have enough room left over for energize.0
-
Steeme wrote:This is why energize is an all or nothing type investment, which makes Kaladesh very weak. There's no way you can survive fully optimized decks without using some of the key utility cards from prior sets, and there's no way you can fit all of those utility cards and have enough room left over for energize.
Actually in this deck I only have 1-2 energize card in each deck, and it does the job pretty well.
I only notice it energizes the whole board well because I'm basically blind to energized gems, so energizing the board slows my matching to a crawl.
When this high stakes event is over, I look forward to potentially abuse saheeli artistry.0 -
Ohboy wrote:Steeme wrote:This is why energize is an all or nothing type investment, which makes Kaladesh very weak. There's no way you can survive fully optimized decks without using some of the key utility cards from prior sets, and there's no way you can fit all of those utility cards and have enough room left over for energize.
Actually in this deck I only have 1-2 energize card in each deck, and it does the job pretty well.
I only notice it energizes the whole board well because I'm basically blind to energized gems, so energizing the board slows my matching to a crawl.
When this high stakes event is over, I look forward to potentially abuse saheeli artistry.
I was hoping to do that with Rattlechains or GR. sadly, the new hexproof mechanics mean one can no longer target one's own with single target buff spells.
Please, stay on topic. // Alve0 -
Ohboy wrote:I look forward to potentially abuse saheeli artistry.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 44.8K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.5K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.3K MPQ General Discussion
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2K MPQ Character Discussion
- 171 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.3K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 6.2K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 13.6K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 508 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.4K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 424 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 299 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.7K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 381 Other Games
- 142 General Discussion
- 239 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements