Bowgentle wrote: Lemminkäinen wrote: When going for T100 in a release event (so between four and six clears of every node) in PvE I get between four and eight intercepts per day. I don't understand how you can get to fifteen. I wonder if there are indeed regional differences or something. Or maybe Grimskald is T5 and grinds all nodes to zero, which would explain the discrepancy a bit, I guess? Oh, and I didn't count the HP or CP as ISO though I suppose you could. Intercepts only happen as long as there are rewards left, so there are no intercepts after clear 6.
Lemminkäinen wrote: When going for T100 in a release event (so between four and six clears of every node) in PvE I get between four and eight intercepts per day. I don't understand how you can get to fifteen. I wonder if there are indeed regional differences or something. Or maybe Grimskald is T5 and grinds all nodes to zero, which would explain the discrepancy a bit, I guess? Oh, and I didn't count the HP or CP as ISO though I suppose you could.
aesthetocyst wrote: Updated the OP with additional plots. One excluding 5* iso costs, one excluding 4*s and 5*s.
aesthetocyst wrote: Dekliko1978 wrote: How say others? Do casual players burn iso on boosts? ______________How about skip tax? Players were spending mountains of iso chasing cc's! Is skip tax still eating up iso flow?
Dekliko1978 wrote: How say others? Do casual players burn iso on boosts? ______________How about skip tax? Players were spending mountains of iso chasing cc's! Is skip tax still eating up iso flow?
aesthetocyst wrote: Punter1 wrote: In the 1-3* only plot why does the ISO needed keep steadily increasing over the last year? I can see the jump for champs and 3* Strange, but other than those additions what else is providing the small steady increase? Shouldn't it be flat for large periods of time since most new ISO needs now are the addition of 4*? I dunno will look at it this evening. Was hurried this morning, noticed that, decided to roll with it for now. The hump up is the addition of champ fees. And of course a small step up for Strang3. But yeah should be otherwise flat for last 18mos.
Punter1 wrote: In the 1-3* only plot why does the ISO needed keep steadily increasing over the last year? I can see the jump for champs and 3* Strange, but other than those additions what else is providing the small steady increase? Shouldn't it be flat for large periods of time since most new ISO needs now are the addition of 4*?